Thread View: uk.rec.motorcycles
38 messages
38 total messages
Started by "Gingerposer"
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:46
Ad-blocker
Author: "Gingerposer"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:46
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:46
3 lines
53 bytes
53 bytes
please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on.
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Steve"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:03
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:03
14 lines
373 bytes
373 bytes
"Gingerposer" <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:bl9nhb$64p$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... > please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. > If you're on Windows and use IE, then download the Google toolbar, as it blocks pop-up ads very well. Mozilla has recently duplicated this functionality in its browser. -- Steve '02 YZF-R6
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:32
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:32
13 lines
551 bytes
551 bytes
Pip <pip@ukrm.net> spouted the following in news:fgognv4k9lo9n585ravo2sqqfqift6otsh@4ax.com: > http://www.proxomitron.info/ nice one Pip. I like this one. Before, I just stuck a list of all the adservers in the world into the windows hosts file and set their addresses to be localhost, which worked, insomuch as inline ad frames on webpages just looked like little 404 pages. The disadvantage was that you needed to hit the back button several timea to back out of a page with several ad frames on. This sorts that problem neatly. Ta M8 :-)
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:35
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:35
17 lines
460 bytes
460 bytes
"Steve" <me@somewhere.com> spouted the following in news:UBZdb.5184044 $mA4.734184@news.easynews.com: > "Gingerposer" <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in > message news:bl9nhb$64p$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... >> please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. >> > > If you're on Windows and use IE, then download the Google toolbar, as it > blocks pop-up ads very well. > No. Don't. Honestly, it's not a good idea. -- tallbloke
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Robbo"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:48
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:48
36 lines
674 bytes
674 bytes
please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. Nicked from Canes posting around a month ago NoAds http://www.southbaypc.com/ -- - - Robbo 1500GL 1988 Goldwing (Rebuild in process) BotaFOF #19 E.O.S.M 2001/2002/2003 B.O.S.M 2003 FURSWB#1 KotL YTC449 PM#7 \= / \= / / \ \= / / \\\' , / // \\\//, / //, \_-//' / / /<, \ /// <//` / >> \\\`__/ /,)-^>> _\` \\\ (/ \\ //\\ // _//\\\\ (( (( .
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Pip
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:49
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:49
20 lines
673 bytes
673 bytes
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:46:33 +0100, "Gingerposer" <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. http://www.proxomitron.info/ It's free and it works. I've not seen a pop-up since installing it - and it does a lot of other stuff too. Just remember to click on the Proxomitron logo after a restart, before you go surfing (otherwise it won't let you access the net, see) and away you go. -- Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly. WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3 ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space> UKRMRM#14 TWA#2
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Fr. Jack
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:33
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:33
10 lines
170 bytes
170 bytes
The unit known as Gingerposer wrote: >please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. > Ad Aware http://www.lavasoftusa.com/support/download/ -- FJ 96 Tiger 900
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Muck"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:55
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:55
26 lines
754 bytes
754 bytes
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:35:05 +0000, tallbloke wrote: > "Steve" <me@somewhere.com> spouted the following in news:UBZdb.5184044 > $mA4.734184@news.easynews.com: > >> "Gingerposer" <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote >> in message news:bl9nhb$64p$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... >>> please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. >>> >>> >> If you're on Windows and use IE, then download the Google toolbar, as it >> blocks pop-up ads very well. >> >> > > No. Don't. Honestly, it's not a good idea. I thought that the google toolbar was spyware, is that why? -- Muck Bandit 600n(With added ducktape); CG125(MSOTHPR) "I've got a CG125, and I'm not affraid to use it." DS#1 ; DOMO#1 ; SH#2 ; ICQ: 166144431 Remove _TEETH_ to e-mail
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Muck"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:02
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:02
28 lines
866 bytes
866 bytes
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:49:22 +0100, Pip wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:46:33 +0100, "Gingerposer" > <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > >>please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. > > http://www.proxomitron.info/ > > It's free and it works. > > I've not seen a pop-up since installing it - and it does a lot of other > stuff too. Just remember to click on the Proxomitron logo after a > restart, before you go surfing (otherwise it won't let you access the net, > see) and away you go. What Pip says... Good bit of kit it is, does what it says on the tin, and a hell of a lot more. Should be a standard bit of kit on every web connected Windows box. -- Muck Bandit 600n(With added ducktape); CG125(MSOTHPR) "I've got a CG125, and I'm not affraid to use it." DS#1 ; DOMO#1 ; SH#2 ; ICQ: 166144431 Remove _TEETH_ to e-mail
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: steve auvache
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:13
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:13
14 lines
379 bytes
379 bytes
tallbloke wrote >Pip <pip@ukrm.net> spouted the following in >news:fgognv4k9lo9n585ravo2sqqfqift6otsh@4ax.com: > >> http://www.proxomitron.info/ > >nice one Pip. I like this one. I just been to this site using opera and from what I can see on the test page I have already got it turned on enough and don't need no extra pop up killer stuff. Which is nice. -- steve auvache
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Steve"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:18
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:18
21 lines
486 bytes
486 bytes
"Muck" <mr.muck@vir_TEETH_gin.net> wrote in message news:pan.2003.09.29.17.55.41.110863@vir_TEETH_gin.net... [snip] > >>> > >> If you're on Windows and use IE, then download the Google toolbar, as it > >> blocks pop-up ads very well. > > No. Don't. Honestly, it's not a good idea. > > I thought that the google toolbar was spyware, is that why? > It asks you whether you want to send information to Google when you install it, it's quite simple to click 'no'. -- Steve '02 YZF-R6
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Cane"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:53
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:53
18 lines
477 bytes
477 bytes
"Fr. Jack" <someothercunt@overthere.com> wrote in message news:i7rgnvgev1scl3b3f6fvsu7h90b0v2npra@4ax.com... > >please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. > > > > Ad Aware http://www.lavasoftusa.com/support/download/ That's the puppy :) -- cane [at] ukrm.org ¦ fireblade, r30 botafo t#50 f#03 YTC #15 bbb #6 pm #6 apostle [kotl] flo#12[with bar] New? http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmscbt.html Rideout? http://www.horrible.demon.co.uk/botafof/ "Suckling the Mender"
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Mash"
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:48
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:48
6 lines
38 bytes
38 bytes
http://toolbar.google.com -- Mash
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Ben
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:49
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:49
30 lines
1047 bytes
1047 bytes
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:55:44 +0100, "Muck" <mr.muck@vir_TEETH_gin.net> wrote: >On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:35:05 +0000, tallbloke wrote: > >> "Steve" <me@somewhere.com> spouted the following in news:UBZdb.5184044 >> $mA4.734184@news.easynews.com: >> >>> "Gingerposer" <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote >>> in message news:bl9nhb$64p$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... >>>> please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. >>>> >>>> >>> If you're on Windows and use IE, then download the Google toolbar, as it >>> blocks pop-up ads very well. >>> >>> >> >> No. Don't. Honestly, it's not a good idea. > >I thought that the google toolbar was spyware, is that why? It's spyware in the sense that it tells Google what you've been searching for and your IP etc, yes. But then they can glean that information from you using the webpage. -- DIAABTCOD#11 BOTAFOT#75 ex-two#19 "We take these risks, not to escape from life, but to prevent life escaping from us." ********* replace 'spam' with 'ben' to reply ********
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Timo Geusch
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:55
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:55
9 lines
314 bytes
314 bytes
Gingerposer was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever: > please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. Mozilla Firebird is *very* good at blocking pop-ups and -unders. -- Timo Geusch Morini Corsaro 125 | Bimota YB7 | Sprint ST BOTAFOF #33 TWA#10 The UKRM FAQ: http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmfaq1.html
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:30
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:30
14 lines
425 bytes
425 bytes
Ben <spam@randygerbil.com> spouted the following in news:353hnvcv7ihrsgk6umgo6badjfia1ole3i@4ax.com: > It's spyware in the sense that it tells Google what you've been > searching for and your IP etc, yes. But then they can glean that > information from you using the webpage. I recommend the use of the google proxy at http://www.google-watch.org/cgi-bin/proxy.htm for subject matter sensitive searches. -- tallbloke
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:31
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:31
13 lines
376 bytes
376 bytes
"Steve" <me@somewhere.com> spouted the following in news:Vz%db.313038$Ji7.3427030@news.easynews.com: > "Muck" <mr.muck@vir_TEETH_gin.net> wrote in message >> I thought that the google toolbar was spyware, is that why? >> > > It asks you whether you want to send information to Google when you > install it, it's quite simple to click 'no'. > Lol, the naievete of youth.
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Ben Blaney
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:43
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:43
10 lines
192 bytes
192 bytes
Gingerposer wrote: >please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. Turn the computer off and listen to Radio Four. -- Ben Blaney GSF1200 VFR800 CBR600 CD200 "We stopped only for fuel"
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Champ
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:36
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:36
21 lines
829 bytes
829 bytes
On 29 Sep 2003 21:30:41 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote: >Ben <spam@randygerbil.com> spouted the following in >news:353hnvcv7ihrsgk6umgo6badjfia1ole3i@4ax.com: > >> It's spyware in the sense that it tells Google what you've been >> searching for and your IP etc, yes. But then they can glean that >> information from you using the webpage. > >I recommend the use of the google proxy at >http://www.google-watch.org/cgi-bin/proxy.htm > >for subject matter sensitive searches. You believe the X Files style crap on that site, and have the gall to call other people naive? -- Champ : worse than Bonwick GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX7RR Endurance Racer GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFO(T|F)#35 UKRMFBC#2 IHABWTMMJ#3 MCT#5 WG*#1 BONY#40 DFV#8 IbW#17 SBS#34 Racing : www.team-ukrm.com. Vanity Publishing : www.champ.org.uk
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:11
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:11
31 lines
1024 bytes
1024 bytes
Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> spouted the following in news:8uchnvcj70l3hngmh0em3hr0b522j4hn4v@4ax.com: > On 29 Sep 2003 21:30:41 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote: > >>Ben <spam@randygerbil.com> spouted the following in >>news:353hnvcv7ihrsgk6umgo6badjfia1ole3i@4ax.com: >> >>> It's spyware in the sense that it tells Google what you've been >>> searching for and your IP etc, yes. But then they can glean that >>> information from you using the webpage. >> >>I recommend the use of the google proxy at >>http://www.google-watch.org/cgi-bin/proxy.htm >> >>for subject matter sensitive searches. > > You believe the X Files style crap on that site, and have the gall to > call other people naive? Just because I make use of the sites proxy onto google it doesn't follow that I believe the content of the site does it Champ? Not at the school of logic I went to. Not sure what you are referring to anyway, it's all pretty factual stuff that you can draw your own conclusions from, or not. -- tallbloke
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:13
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:13
29 lines
925 bytes
925 bytes
Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> spouted the following in news:9rchnvk84l6sa4s53s9h6eqkh1cm1sofgj@4ax.com: > On 29 Sep 2003 17:35:05 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote: > >>"Steve" <me@somewhere.com> spouted the following in news:UBZdb.5184044 >>$mA4.734184@news.easynews.com: >> >>> "Gingerposer" <newsboy@DELETETHEPORKgingerposer.freeserve.co.uk> >>> wrote in message news:bl9nhb$64p$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... >>>> please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. >>>> >>> >>> If you're on Windows and use IE, then download the Google toolbar, >>> as it blocks pop-up ads very well. > >>No. Don't. Honestly, it's not a good idea. > > It seems an excellent idea to me - I couldn't manage without the > google toolbar nowadays. And don't give me any of that "woo, they're > watching you" paranoid bollox. Ok. But remember, just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they're not watching you ;-) -- tallbloke
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:24
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:24
17 lines
671 bytes
671 bytes
Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> spouted the following in news:8uchnvcj70l3hngmh0em3hr0b522j4hn4v@4ax.com: > You believe the X Files style crap on that site, and have the gall to > call other people naive? from the site: Google's toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if you'd like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates automatically presents a massive security risk. Not particularly 'X Files' is it?
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: "Steve"
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:13
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:13
17 lines
410 bytes
410 bytes
"tallbloke" <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote in message news:Xns9406C8B1EB34heresthebeer@195.149.20.147... [snip] > > But remember, just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they're not > watching you ;-) > You've got an exceptionally large ego if you think they're looking at /your/ searches over the other millions of others. At most you are just a statistic, sorry to disappoint you. -- Steve '02 YZF-R6
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Champ
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:10
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:10
40 lines
1637 bytes
1637 bytes
On 30 Sep 2003 00:11:42 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote: >Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> spouted the following in >news:8uchnvcj70l3hngmh0em3hr0b522j4hn4v@4ax.com: > >> On 29 Sep 2003 21:30:41 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote: >>>I recommend the use of the google proxy at >>>http://www.google-watch.org/cgi-bin/proxy.htm >>> >>>for subject matter sensitive searches. >> >> You believe the X Files style crap on that site, and have the gall to >> call other people naive? > >Just because I make use of the sites proxy onto google it doesn't follow >that I believe the content of the site does it Champ? No, but I'm wondering *why* you're recommending that people don't use the google toolbar >Not sure what you are referring to anyway, it's all pretty factual stuff >that you can draw your own conclusions from, or not. Yes, it's factual stuff knitted together for the gullible to leap to conclusions e.g. "Matt Cutts, a software engineer at Google since January 2000, used to work for the National Security Agency and has a top-secret clearance. Google would like to hire more like him. Can you trust Google with a database of all the search terms you've ever used?" The inference is that because an employee used to work for the spooks, his new employers can't be trusted - it's just kids stuff. -- Champ : A welcome patch of grey in a black and white world GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX-7RR Endurance Racer (nearly finished) GYASB#0;BotToS#2;BOTAFO(T|F)#35;UKRMFBC#2;IHABWTMMJ#3;MCT#5;WG*#1;BONY#40;DFV#8;IbW#17;SBS#34;BHaLC#1 Racing : www.team-ukrm.co.uk. Vanity Publishing : www.champ.org.uk
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Jeremy
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:28
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:28
19 lines
556 bytes
556 bytes
> Pip <pip@ukrm.net> spouted the following in > news:fgognv4k9lo9n585ravo2sqqfqift6otsh@4ax.com: > > > http://www.proxomitron.info/ > Downloaded this morning and it seems effective - lots of nice features (vile colour scheme though :( ) It seems to inhibit the displaying of all gif images on a web page - is this normal - couldn't find a setting to alter this behaviour. There is an option to bar animated gifs but unchecking this didn't make any difference to static ones. Is this normal? -- jeremy ['75 RD250A] | ['02 Fazer 600 in blue]
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Cab
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:48
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:48
21 lines
906 bytes
906 bytes
On 30 Sep 2003 00:24:24 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> bored us all completely to death with wittery prose along the lines of: <prolly snipped> >Google's toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This >means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has >complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which >is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if >you'd like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates >automatically presents a massive security risk. That's bollox and full of paranoia. Sorry dude. -- Cab :^) - Ormiga Atomica GSX1400 - 'Tarts Handbag' (tm) Bike, dead 550/4 Rat UKRMMA#10 (KoTL), IbW#015, Bob#4, POTM#3 P.S. Remove your_bollox from the cab. ICQ: 83023471 Newbies FAQ's at : http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmscbt.html My Page : http://www.rosbif.org/
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Bear
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:02
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:02
16 lines
561 bytes
561 bytes
Jeremy wibbled ... > Downloaded this morning and it seems effective - lots of nice features > (vile colour scheme though :( ) Yeah the owner mentions that, and how to get around it, on his site, IIRC. -- Bear ***************************************************************** TART#1 UKRMHRC#8 GHPOTHUF#4 HB#2 TCP#1a DIAABTCOD#4 KotYTC# WG* UKRMFBC#3 BOTAFOT#1 MSWR#2 ***************************************************************** "omnis culpa ursi est." Bear's Current Paw Track: "Foo Fighters - Times Like These (Studio Acoustic)"
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Bear
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:04
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:04
34 lines
1311 bytes
1311 bytes
Champ wibbled ... > On 30 Sep 2003 00:24:24 GMT, tallbloke <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote: > > >Champ <ukrm@champ.org.uk> spouted the following in > >news:8uchnvcj70l3hngmh0em3hr0b522j4hn4v@4ax.com: > > > > > >> You believe the X Files style crap on that site, and have the gall to > >> call other people naive? > > > >from the site: > > > >Google's toolbar updates to new versions quietly, and without asking. This > >means that if you have the toolbar installed, Google essentially has > >complete access to your hard disk every time you connect to Google (which > >is many times a day). Most software vendors, and even Microsoft, ask if > >you'd like an updated version. But not Google. Any software that updates > >automatically presents a massive security risk. > > It's also completely untrue. I had to manually upgrade the tool bar > recently What features does the toolbar give you? [1] [1] specifically which ones do you use and like? -- Bear ***************************************************************** TART#1 UKRMHRC#8 GHPOTHUF#4 HB#2 TCP#1a DIAABTCOD#4 KotYTC# WG* UKRMFBC#3 BOTAFOT#1 MSWR#2 ***************************************************************** "omnis culpa ursi est." Bear's Current Paw Track: "Foo Fighters - Times Like These (Studio Acoustic)"
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Champ
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:20
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:20
25 lines
1141 bytes
1141 bytes
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:04:58 +0100, Bear <bastardUNDERSCOREbear@yahoo.com> wrote: >What features does the toolbar give you? [1] > >[1] specifically which ones do you use and like? Well, you get a permanent little search term window, so you never have to go to google.com itself - that's a least one keyclick saved. Then it provides a little drop down of the words in your search, and when you click on one of them, it takes you to the occurence of the word in the target document. My other favourite feature is the 'up' button, that takes you up thru the URL (this needs an eg).... Say a google search has taken you to www.a.com/foo/bar/whatever.htm. Hit the 'up' button, and it takes you to www.a.com/foo/bar/. Hit it again and it takes you to www.a.com/foo/. One last time takes you to www.a.com. If find this very useful. hth -- Champ : A welcome patch of grey in a black and white world GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZX-7RR Endurance Racer (nearly finished) GYASB#0;BotToS#2;BOTAFO(T|F)#35;UKRMFBC#2;IHABWTMMJ#3;MCT#5;WG*#1;BONY#40;DFV#8;IbW#17;SBS#34;BHaLC#1 Racing : www.team-ukrm.co.uk. Vanity Publishing : www.champ.org.uk
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Bear
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:22
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:22
38 lines
1383 bytes
1383 bytes
Champ wibbled ... > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:04:58 +0100, Bear > <bastardUNDERSCOREbear@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >What features does the toolbar give you? [1] > > > >[1] specifically which ones do you use and like? > > Well, you get a permanent little search term window, so you never have > to go to google.com itself - that's a least one keyclick saved. I've added google.co.uk as a button to my IE. > Then > it provides a little drop down of the words in your search, and when > you click on one of them, it takes you to the occurence of the word in > the target document. My other favourite feature is the 'up' button, > that takes you up thru the URL (this needs an eg).... > > Say a google search has taken you to www.a.com/foo/bar/whatever.htm. > Hit the 'up' button, and it takes you to www.a.com/foo/bar/. Hit it > again and it takes you to www.a.com/foo/. One last time takes you to > www.a.com. If find this very useful. Ah right, yes that does sound useful. > hth It did, ta; I'll try it and see I think. -- Bear ***************************************************************** TART#1 UKRMHRC#8 GHPOTHUF#4 HB#2 TCP#1a DIAABTCOD#4 KotYTC# WG* UKRMFBC#3 BOTAFOT#1 MSWR#2 ***************************************************************** "omnis culpa ursi est." Bear's Current Paw Track: "Foo Fighters - Times Like These (Studio Acoustic)"
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Power Grainger
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:11
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:11
15 lines
377 bytes
377 bytes
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:43:10 +0100, Ben Blaney <benblaney@ukrm.net> wrote: >Gingerposer wrote: > >>please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. > >Turn the computer off and listen to Radio Four. Only way I can listen to radio 4 during the day is via my computer. Which kind of relies on the computer being on. -- Claire Grainger ZXR400 DFWAG#5 TWA#8 IbW#21 BOTAFOT#?
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Badger
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:38
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:38
14 lines
396 bytes
396 bytes
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:05:06 +0100, Ben wrote: > > Most of my searching is pretty innocent, and even when I do > search for slightly dodgy stuff, I'm one of millions doing so and > won't be noticed. Probably depends on the values of "slightly". e.g. MILF will be rated "systems normal" but "distillery webcam" will get the big red flashy lights. -- Rick NT650V TWA#11 BREast#6 BOTAFOT#139
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Ben
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:39
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:39
19 lines
690 bytes
690 bytes
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:38:42 +0100, Badger <spam@housemartin.f9.co.uk> wrote: >On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:05:06 +0100, Ben wrote: >> >> Most of my searching is pretty innocent, and even when I do >> search for slightly dodgy stuff, I'm one of millions doing so and >> won't be noticed. > >Probably depends on the values of "slightly". e.g. MILF will be rated >"systems normal" but "distillery webcam" will get the big red flashy >lights. And "kiddy porn" will result in "what, another one?" -- DIAABTCOD#11 BOTAFOT#75 ex-two#19 "We take these risks, not to escape from life, but to prevent life escaping from us." ********* replace 'spam' with 'ben' to reply ********
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Switters
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:24
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:24
13 lines
471 bytes
471 bytes
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:20:19 GMT, Champ <news@champ.org.uk> allegedly wrote: > Well, you get a permanent little search term window, so you never have > to go to google.com itself - that's a least one keyclick saved. Mozilla has this by default - type stuff into the address bar, and as well as matching previous URLs it offers the option to web search. Also, highlight some text in a document with the mouse, right click and select web search - brilliant. - Dave.
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Phil Launchbury
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:35
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:35
17 lines
608 bytes
608 bytes
In article <slrnbnh3h1.2md9.tnews@nermal.unix-consult.com>, Timo Geusch wrote: > Gingerposer was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever: >> please recommend me a good free one. go on, go on. > > Mozilla Firebird is *very* good at blocking pop-ups and -unders. Yup. *And* has a handy google-search field where you just type in your search and hit enter... Phil -- Phil Launchbury, Network & Infrastructure PHB Triumph Tiger 955i 'Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are quick to anger and have no need of subtlety' Remove sick person to email me
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: Switters
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:46
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 13:46
21 lines
774 bytes
774 bytes
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:21:50 GMT, Phil Launchbury <phill@vnuinc.co.uk> allegedly wrote: > In article <Xns94077E348565Fnospamta@130.133.1.4>, Switters wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:20:19 GMT, Champ <news@champ.org.uk> allegedly >> wrote: >> >>> Well, you get a permanent little search term window, so you never >>> have to go to google.com itself - that's a least one keyclick saved. >> >> Mozilla has this by default - type stuff into the address bar, and as >> well as matching previous URLs it offers the option to web search. > > And the reason that they both have the same feature is... > > <Roll of drums> > > Firebird is Mozilla! Albeit without the bloaty bits > like mail/news client, IRC client etc etc. I thought Champers was talking about IE. Oh well.
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: tallbloke
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:54
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:54
37 lines
1322 bytes
1322 bytes
"Steve" <me@somewhere.com> spouted the following in news:R2aeb.5217900$cI2.737197@news.easynews.com: > "tallbloke" <rog@tallARSEDbloke.net> wrote in message > news:Xns9406C8B1EB34heresthebeer@195.149.20.147... > [snip] >> >> But remember, just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they're not >> watching you ;-) >> > > You've got an exceptionally large ego if you think they're looking at > /your/ searches over the other millions of others. At most you are > just a statistic, sorry to disappoint you. > Yebbut, it's not so much that I have the conceit to think they are anxious to know what I'm up to at any given moment. It's more that because google archives this stuff (The cookie expires in 2038) they can pull out a search history and use it for profiling at any point in the future. Given the increasingley paranoid nature of The US administration and it's poodle Mr Tory Bliar, who knows what sort of witch huntery they may dream up after the id cards are issued. I just don't like being profiled by a commercial company which has you agree to them doing more or less what they like with the data they gather on you when you click 'yes' in their license agreement, or even just use their search engine. Targeted advertising annoys me as much as political repression... nearly. -- tallbloke
Re: Ad-blocker
Author: christofire
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:53
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:53
15 lines
528 bytes
528 bytes
In article <3f787bb8$0$805$fb624cd1@news1.zeelandnet.nl>, mb says... > Proxomitron for those little ads and panicware pop-up stopper, free edition. > www.panicware.com Why? Proxomitron kills popup windows, and if you don't want to kill them you just hit "bypass", do whatever needed popups and then return to normal. -- Christofire ex-two#20(KotL) DIAABTCOD#1 Suzuki SV650SK TPPFAUICG#69BONY#10MIRTTH#7IMANASS#2SbS#20BOTAFOT#117 "But..he looks so *innocent*" Full throttle for 55 minutes - a hell of a buzz.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads