🚀 go-pugleaf

Rejected for insufficient new material:

[snip for focus]

> >>>> I gave a link summarising the findings but Todal chose to snip it out,
> >>>> maybe he's had enough of experts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here it is again:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/basics/nature-vs-nurture
> >>>
> >>> It's irrelevant.
> >> 
> >> It directly contradicts your claim that adults are usually the
> >> product of their upbringing.
> >
> >It is obvious that upbringing has a major effect on the character and 
> >attitudes of an adult
> 
> *Can* have an effect but not necessarily a major one.
> 
> > and I must therefore contradict your own claim 
> 
> Not *my* claim, it's the conclusions of professionals who are expert
> in the area.
> 
> >that it's mostly genetics and that bad parenting is an irrelevant factor.
> 
> Neither of which I or they said.This habit of yours of attacking me
> for things I didn't say is becoming monotonous.


So a poster can attack me for things I didn't say but I'm not allowed
to point out that I didn't say those things - so much for a 'right of
reply'.

 That's twice in a row that has happened to me. The fact that Ihe
poster I was correcting on both occasions is a moderator may be a
coincidence …. or then again, maybe not.


==================

Noe, I posted this earlier but it got buried under an old thread