🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
<notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:

>
>The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>Syrian border.
>
>That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>
>Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.

That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.

>Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys,

Raping little boys?  Is this, like, *directly* off of Howard Dean's
latest talking points?

>covering
>people in shit, electricity to the genitals,

Yikes!

>smeering people in menstral
>blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.

Menstral blood!  OMG.  How they must have suffered.

argos

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>
> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> Syrian border.
>
> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>
> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>
>
> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in menstral
> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>
> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping out
> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>
> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who caused
> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>


Another appeasement coward heard from.

"George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
news:TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22...
>
> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
>>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>>>
>>> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>>> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>>> Syrian border.
>>>
>>> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>>> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>>>
>>> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>>> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>>> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
>>> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in menstral
>>> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>>> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>>>
>>> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping out
>>> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>>>
>>> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who caused
>>> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>
> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
>
> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for a
> cup>
>

I try not to be a rabble rouser, and even them I'm wrong.
I still advocate the sterilization option, one MIRV.

We have backup.



            Jim E

In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
 argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >Syrian border.
> >
> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >
> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>
> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.


Pretending to care for the Iraqis - the bs rightwing party line.

Like Shock & Awe was a great demonstration of love. Help the Iraqis by
dropping 44,000 bombs on them, then invading killing everything else
that moves.
The rightwing neocons are very psychologically sick, beyond healing.

Rightwing wackos -well named.






>
> >Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> >the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys,
>
> Raping little boys?  Is this, like, *directly* off of Howard Dean's
> latest talking points?
>
> >covering
> >people in shit, electricity to the genitals,
>
> Yikes!
>
> >smeering people in menstral
> >blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> >democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>
> Menstral blood!  OMG.  How they must have suffered.
>
> argos



--
the dang

dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
$Io.98830@clgrps13:

>
> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> Syrian border.
>
> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>
> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>
>
If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe that
too ?

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:wwTcf.192897$ir4.135655@edtnps90...
> In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >Syrian border.
>> >
>> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >
>> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>
>> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
>> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
>> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
>> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
>> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
>> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>
>
> Pretending to care for the Iraqis - the bs rightwing party line.
>
> Like Shock & Awe was a great demonstration of love. Help the Iraqis by
> dropping 44,000 bombs on them, then invading killing everything else
> that moves.

There is no way you could have any idea how many bombs we dropped.  Did you
count them as they fell?  Because if you did, then we will will have to
admit that we may have missed a target.

George<painting a red bullseye on bungholenoodlo, one circle at a time>

"Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>
>>
>> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> Syrian border.
>>
>> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>>
>> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>
>>
> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe
> that
> too ?

What that means is that we are making life difficult for the insurgency,
and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing something
right.

George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter as it
hits the floor of his spiderhole>

"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
>
> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>>
>> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> Syrian border.
>>
>> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>>
>> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>
>>
>> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
>> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in menstral
>> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>>
>> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping out
>> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>>
>> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who caused
>> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>>
>
>
> Another appeasement coward heard from.

Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter

George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for a
cup>

"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
news:3tim0hFt24svU1@individual.net...
>
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
> news:TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22...
>>
>> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
>> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
>>>
>>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>>>>
>>>> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>>>> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>>>> Syrian border.
>>>>
>>>> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>>>> kill
>>>> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>>>>
>>>> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>>>> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>>>> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
>>>> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>>>> menstral
>>>> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>>>> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>>>>
>>>> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
>>>> out
>>>> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>>>>
>>>> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>>>> caused
>>>> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>>
>> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
>>
>> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for
>> a cup>
>>
>
> I try not to be a rabble rouser, and even them I'm wrong.
> I still advocate the sterilization option, one MIRV.
>
> We have backup.
>
>
>
>            Jim E

That's overkill, don't you think?  I'm more in favor of making him treat
his woman like an equal,  If that doesn't kill his Wahabbi arse, then it's
hopeless anyway.

George

In article <3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net>, "Jim  E" <YD641387@SEA.net>
wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
> >
> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> > Syrian border.
> >
> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >
> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >
> >
> > Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> > the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
> > people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in menstral
> > blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> > democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
> >
> > Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping out
> > people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
> >
> > If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who caused
> > the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
> >
>
>
> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>
>

It's not all that difficult. If you do something and you get negative
results, stop doing it and try something different. People like yourself
that are locked into patterns of behaviour, because of immature labeling
such as this is brave, that is coward, should not have graduated from
primary school.

Futhermore, upon closer and more accurate inspection, you will find that
you have choosen the path of the coward.
eg. you live in a neighbourhood, and a very strange possibly threatening
person moves in on the block. Which neighbour runs to buy a gun first,
the confident one, or the frightened one. OK the guy starts making
threatening noises so who shoots first? Of course it's the frightened
one. And the frightened one will also be found on
uk.current-events.terrorism shouting wolf too, as you nuts are in the
habit of doing.




--
the dang

In article <TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
> >
> > "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
> >>
> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> Syrian border.
> >>
> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >>
> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> >> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
> >> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in menstral
> >> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> >> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
> >>
> >> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping out
> >> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
> >>
> >> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who caused
> >> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Another appeasement coward heard from.
>
> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
>
> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for a
> cup>
>
>

George, this topic is a bit over the head of anyone trying to block out
the shame of his own fascist wannabe Bush crime family government.
Perhaps you should stay focused on monitoring the status of Muslim head
gear.
Go ahead, plonk me for your own good.



--
the dang

"For the US, Iraq is a black hole. It has sucked lives, money, values,
 principles, and the minds of all Bush supporters.

And all are NOT coming back."
"Did I mention your good name is gone too."

In article <dJVcf.318612$084.120945@attbi_s22>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
> news:3tim0hFt24svU1@individual.net...
> >
> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
> > news:TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22...
> >>
> >> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
> >> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
> >>>
> >>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
> >>>>
> >>>> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >>>> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >>>> Syrian border.
> >>>>
> >>>> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >>>> kill
> >>>> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >>>>
> >>>> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >>>> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> >>>> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
> >>>> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
> >>>> menstral
> >>>> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> >>>> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
> >>>>
> >>>> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
> >>>> out
> >>>> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
> >>>>
> >>>> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
> >>>> caused
> >>>> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Another appeasement coward heard from.
> >>
> >> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
> >>
> >> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for
> >> a cup>
> >>
> >
> > I try not to be a rabble rouser, and even them I'm wrong.
> > I still advocate the sterilization option, one MIRV.
> >
> > We have backup.
> >
> >
> >
> >            Jim E
>
> That's overkill, don't you think?  I'm more in favor of making him treat
> his woman like an equal,  If that doesn't kill his Wahabbi arse, then it's
> hopeless anyway.
>
> George
>
>

We must witness George with nothing again. No dealing with the points or
the logic of the content. No rebuttals, no yes buts, no maybe nots, and
"no thinking" beyond cheap ad hominem nonsense.

The lads an empty skull.

--
the dang

In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
 Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:

> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>
> >
> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> > Syrian border.
> >
> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >
> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >
> >
> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe that
> too ?
>

Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven pathological
liars when it comes to the war.



--
the dang

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84...
> In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
> Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
>> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>>
>> >
>> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> > Syrian border.
>> >
>> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> > kill
>> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >
>> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >
>> >
>> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe
>> that
>> too ?
>>
>
> Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
> Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven pathological
> liars when it comes to the war.
>
>
>
> --
> the dang

Yet you are perfectly willing to go along with Wahabbis who fly jumbo jets
into skyscrapers.  I'm not surprised.

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:FeXcf.102032$S4.50464@edtnps84...
> In article <dJVcf.318612$084.120945@attbi_s22>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
>> news:3tim0hFt24svU1@individual.net...
>> >
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote in message
>> > news:TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22...
>> >>
>> >> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
>> >>>
>> >>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >>> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >>>> saying
>> >>>> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> Syrian border.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >>>> kill
>> >>>> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >>>> out
>> >>>> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and
>> >>>> stop
>> >>>> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys,
>> >>>> covering
>> >>>> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>> >>>> menstral
>> >>>> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka,
>> >>>> spreading
>> >>>> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is
>> >>>> wiping
>> >>>> out
>> >>>> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>> >>>> caused
>> >>>> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>> >>
>> >> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
>> >>
>> >> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade
>> >> for
>> >> a cup>
>> >>
>> >
>> > I try not to be a rabble rouser, and even them I'm wrong.
>> > I still advocate the sterilization option, one MIRV.
>> >
>> > We have backup.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >            Jim E
>>
>> That's overkill, don't you think?  I'm more in favor of making him treat
>> his woman like an equal,  If that doesn't kill his Wahabbi arse, then
>> it's
>> hopeless anyway.
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>
> We must witness George with nothing again. No dealing with the points or
> the logic of the content. No rebuttals, no yes buts, no maybe nots, and
> "no thinking" beyond cheap ad hominem nonsense.
>
> The lads an empty skull.
>
> --
> the dang

It' simple, really, Dungnoodle.  There is no logic or point to your posts
other than to demonstrate your all-to-well-known anti-American stance.
Hence there is no need for rebuttals, only ridicule.

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:N5Xcf.102031$S4.7654@edtnps84...
> In article <TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
>> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
>> >
>> > "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> > news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>> >>
>> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >> Syrian border.
>> >>
>> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> kill
>> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >>
>> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> out
>> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>> >> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
>> >> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>> >> menstral
>> >> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>> >> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>> >>
>> >> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
>> >> out
>> >> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>> >>
>> >> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>> >> caused
>> >> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Another appeasement coward heard from.
>>
>> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
>>
>> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for
>> a
>> cup>
>>
>>
>
> George, this topic is a bit over the head of anyone trying to block out
> the shame of his own fascist wannabe Bush crime family government.
> Perhaps you should stay focused on monitoring the status of Muslim head
> gear.

Seeing as how your head is up your arse, any topic would be way over it.

> Go ahead, plonk me for your own good.
>

Naw.  I think I'll stick around and watch you melt.

George<waiting for dukenoodle to push up dayglow daisies>

In article <%2Vcf.318485$084.143280@attbi_s22>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
> news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
> > dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
> > $Io.98830@clgrps13:
> >
> >>
> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> Syrian border.
> >>
> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >>
> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >>
> >>
> > If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe
> > that
> > too ?
>
> What that means is that we are making life difficult for the insurgency,
> and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing something
> right.
>
> George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter as it
> hits the floor of his spiderhole>
>
>
That's wrong in so many ways, it's hard to know where to start.
Obviously you haven't ever followed your assumptions past the next few
steps. Look at the US now. Divided (you are in the minority dude),
broke(Bush has borrowed more money -against your children- than the last
42 presidents combined, and from communist China, Saudia Arabia), more
than 2000 US homes have a flag instead of a spouse, a parent or an
offspring, etc, etc. Ah, why bother with you fools.

The responsibility lies at the feet of the rabid neocons like yourselfs.


--
the dang

"For the US, Iraq is a black hole. It has sucked lives, money, values,
 principles, and the minds of all Bush supporters.

And all are NOT coming back."
"Did I mention your good name is gone too."

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:V2Xcf.102030$S4.47127@edtnps84...
> In article <3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net>, "Jim  E" <YD641387@SEA.net>
> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>> >
>> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> > Syrian border.
>> >
>> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> > kill
>> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >
>> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >
>> >
>> > Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>> > the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
>> > people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>> > menstral
>> > blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>> > democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>> >
>> > Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
>> > out
>> > people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>> >
>> > If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>> > caused
>> > the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>>
>>
>
> It's not all that difficult. If you do something and you get negative
> results, stop doing it and try something different.

Even if one's goal is negative results (i.e., a lot of dead terrorists)?  I
think we will continue to have negative results.  Don't you?  Oh wait.
That's a positive result.  Nevermind.  :-)

George<watching Dugoutnoodleo go into spastic afternirth mode>

dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84:

> In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
>  Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
>> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>>
>> >
>> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> > Syrian border.
>> >
>> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> > kill a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >
>> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> > out of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >
>> >
>> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe
>> that too ?
>>
>
> Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
> Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven pathological
> liars when it comes to the war.
>
>
>

Bend over wangnoodle - Osamas got a woody for you, and he would like to show
you his appreciation for all of your fine support on the usenet.
The day will come when we will launch a shit seeking missle over your town,
and it will home in straight on your empty skull.

In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
 argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >Syrian border.
> >
> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >
> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>
> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.


How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?

You are of course, defining the quagmire congured up and manifested by
people who think as you do -limited. It's all in your mind. The present
Iraqi government have asked the US to leave. That's why I'm making it
simple.


The "take sides" game, is a symptom of "lack of sufficient awareness," a
separation of self which prevents you from experiencing a more complete
reality. You see yourself as much more separate from the rest of the
world than you truely are. Destroy any part of it (ie, other person) and
you destroy a part of yourself to the same degree. That's not an
argument for appeasement, but for a wiser use of force.


--
the dang

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
> In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >Syrian border.
>> >
>> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >
>> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>
>> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
>> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
>> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
>> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
>> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
>> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>
>
> How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?

Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
Amman, are you?

> You are of course, defining the quagmire congured up and manifested by
> people who think as you do -limited. It's all in your mind. The present
> Iraqi government have asked the US to leave. That's why I'm making it
> simple.
>
>
> The "take sides" game, is a symptom of "lack of sufficient awareness," a
> separation of self which prevents you from experiencing a more complete
> reality.

So Dungnoodle.  When are you going to separate your head from your arse?

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:N5Xcf.102031$S4.7654@edtnps84...
> In article <TeVcf.318522$084.233231@attbi_s22>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> wrote in message
>> news:3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net...
>> >
>> > "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> > news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>> >>
>> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >> Syrian border.
>> >>
>> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> kill
>> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >>
>> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
>> >> the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
>> >> people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>> >> menstral
>> >> blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
>> >> democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>> >>
>> >> Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
>> >> out
>> >> people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>> >>
>> >> If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>> >> caused
>> >> the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Another appeasement coward heard from.
>>
>> Appeasement?  Naw.  He's a full-blooded terrorist supporter
>>
>> George<that's like an athletic supporter with a hollowed-out grenade for
>> a
>> cup>
>>
>>
>
> George, this topic is a bit over the head of anyone trying to block out
> the shame of his own fascist wannabe Bush crime family government.
> Perhaps you should stay focused on monitoring the status of Muslim head
> gear.
> Go ahead, plonk me for your own good.
>


You make unsupported allegations, and also little sense.

        Jim E

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:_tXcf.102035$S4.16449@edtnps84...
> In article <%2Vcf.318485$084.143280@attbi_s22>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
>> news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
>> > dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> > news:8qQcf.137852
>> > $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >> Syrian border.
>> >>
>> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> kill
>> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >>
>> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> out
>> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> > believe
>> > that
>> > too ?
>>
>> What that means is that we are making life difficult for the insurgency,
>> and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing something
>> right.
>>
>> George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter as it
>> hits the floor of his spiderhole>
>>
>>
> That's wrong in so many ways, it's hard to know where to start.

How about starting at the facts?  You seem to have difficulty doing this.

> Obviously you haven't ever followed your assumptions past the next few
> steps. Look at the US now. Divided (you are in the minority dude)

Yes, we democrats are in the minority.  There's no doubt about that.  But
that is changing, slowly.

> broke(Bush has borrowed more money -against your children- than the last
> 42 presidents combined, and from communist China, Saudia Arabia), more
> than 2000 US homes have a flag instead of a spouse, a parent or an
> offspring, etc, etc. Ah, why bother with you fools.

Of course, this rant is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not Zarqawi
is getting desparate in his attacks because we are squeezing his pals along
the Syrian border (which was the issue I brought up, if you can focus that
one brain cell of yours long enough to recall).  I recall that he demanded
just today, after he attacked a wedding party in Amman Jordan and two other
hotels (for some damned reason, he killed a bunch of Jordanians and some
Palestinians as well, including a high level Hammas official), that the
U.S. withdraw from the fighting along the Syrian border.  Now exactly why
would he make such a demand if we weren't causing his pals a lot of trouble
there?  The fact is that we are, and that is why he's shitting in his pants
as we speak.  But don't sweat it.  It isn't like you've put your sorry ass
on the line for anyone in your life.  All you have to do is sit behind that
monitor at that little internet cafe you frequent and whine on and one
until your dick falls off.  Oh, by the way.  Wipe the mess off the monitor
when you are finished.

In article <Xns970B16925703Eewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
 Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:

> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84:
>
> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
> >  Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >
> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
> >> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> > Syrian border.
> >> >
> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> > kill a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >
> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
> >> > out of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe
> >> that too ?
> >>
> >
> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven pathological
> > liars when it comes to the war.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Bend over wangnoodle - Osamas got a woody for you, and he would like to show
> you his appreciation for all of your fine support on the usenet.
> The day will come when we will launch a shit seeking missle over your town,
> and it will home in straight on your empty skull.


Got ya. Word homo-erotic spins Jesse into his anal dreams. I'll bet if
they ever get around to disecting rightwing brains, they'll find one big
area reserved for their fingers up their anus.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?idG11

--
the dang

In article <boXcf.535877$_o.191800@attbi_s71>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84...
> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
> > Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >
> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in news:8qQcf.137852
> >> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> > Syrian border.
> >> >
> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> > kill
> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >
> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you believe
> >> that
> >> too ?
> >>
> >
> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven pathological
> > liars when it comes to the war.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > the dang
>
> Yet you are perfectly willing to go along with Wahabbis who fly jumbo jets
> into skyscrapers.  I'm not surprised.
>

Where's Osama. 6'7" or so, on dyalisis for christ's sake.
Yet they can find Saddam in a hole in the ground. But none of the
hyjackers were from Iraq.

Where the anthrax killer that attacked the media and democrats? Yeah
right?
Similar war games both on 7/7 and 9/11. Yeah right.
Shame on you George. You're a poor excuse for an American, supporting
terrorism like you do.



--
the dang

In article <8pYcf.535934$_o.287897@attbi_s71>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:_tXcf.102035$S4.16449@edtnps84...
> > In article <%2Vcf.318485$084.143280@attbi_s22>,
> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
> >> > dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
> >> > news:8qQcf.137852
> >> > $Io.98830@clgrps13:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> >> Syrian border.
> >> >>
> >> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> >> kill
> >> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >>
> >> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
> >> >> out
> >> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
> >> > believe
> >> > that
> >> > too ?
> >>
> >> What that means is that we are making life difficult for the insurgency,
> >> and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing something
> >> right.
> >>
> >> George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter as it
> >> hits the floor of his spiderhole>
> >>
> >>
> > That's wrong in so many ways, it's hard to know where to start.
>
> How about starting at the facts?  You seem to have difficulty doing this.
>
> > Obviously you haven't ever followed your assumptions past the next few
> > steps. Look at the US now. Divided (you are in the minority dude)
>
> Yes, we democrats are in the minority.  There's no doubt about that.  But
> that is changing, slowly.
>
> > broke(Bush has borrowed more money -against your children- than the last
> > 42 presidents combined, and from communist China, Saudia Arabia), more
> > than 2000 US homes have a flag instead of a spouse, a parent or an
> > offspring, etc, etc. Ah, why bother with you fools.
>
> Of course, this rant is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not Zarqawi
> is getting desparate in his attacks because we are squeezing his pals along
> the Syrian border (which was the issue I brought up, if you can focus that
> one brain cell of yours long enough to recall).  I recall that he demanded
> just today, after he attacked a wedding party in Amman Jordan and two other
> hotels (for some damned reason, he killed a bunch of Jordanians and some
> Palestinians as well, including a high level Hammas official), that the
> U.S. withdraw from the fighting along the Syrian border.  Now exactly why
> would he make such a demand if we weren't causing his pals a lot of trouble
> there?  The fact is that we are, and that is why he's shitting in his pants
> as we speak.  But don't sweat it.  It isn't like you've put your sorry ass
> on the line for anyone in your life.  All you have to do is sit behind that
> monitor at that little internet cafe you frequent and whine on and one
> until your dick falls off.  Oh, by the way.  Wipe the mess off the monitor
> when you are finished.
>
>
You don't get it. It was Osama yesterday, Zarqawi today, and a string of
others tomorrow. How many terrorist when the towers came down? 100, 200?
How many now? Thousands perhaps? In 30 countries as reported. Hey
wingnut! Something's not working. You've got a rod knock. It won't be
long before your motor falls out. Think of me as a mechanic pointing at
your car. I don't have a vested interest other than a human concern to
stop the killing of innocent people.
Why is it rightwingers think all they have to do is kill enough people,
and it's going to bring them peace? It's just stupid. But more than
stupid, It just doesn't work. It didn't work yesterday, and it won't
work tomorrow. Ever!

Oh yeah, you rightwing wackos and your perverted sexuality. Yuck.

--
the dang

In article <xcYcf.535922$_o.91106@attbi_s71>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
> > In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> >Syrian border.
> >> >
> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >
> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >>
> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
> >
> >
> > How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?
>
> Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
> Amman, are you?
>
The US has bombed at least 2 weddings.
www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051020_between_a_hard_place.htm

> > You are of course, defining the quagmire congured up and manifested by
> > people who think as you do -limited. It's all in your mind. The present
> > Iraqi government have asked the US to leave. That's why I'm making it
> > simple.
> >
> >
> > The "take sides" game, is a symptom of "lack of sufficient awareness," a
> > separation of self which prevents you from experiencing a more complete
> > reality.
>
> So Dungnoodle.  When are you going to separate your head from your arse?
>
>
You are psychologiclly sick beyond help -neocon rabid.


--
the dang

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:HT%cf.102056$S4.68892@edtnps84...
> In article <xcYcf.535922$_o.91106@attbi_s71>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
>> > In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
>> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >> >Syrian border.
>> >> >
>> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> >kill
>> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >
>> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> >out
>> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >>
>> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
>> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the
>> >> nation
>> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
>> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
>> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
>> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>> >
>> >
>> > How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?
>>
>> Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding
>> in
>> Amman, are you?
>>
> The US has bombed at least 2 weddings.
> www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051020_between_a_hard_place.htm

So you ARE justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
Amman, aren't you?  I guess that makes you a coward as well.  Since the US
doesn't do these things intentionally, and Zarqawi DOES, and with malace
and forethought, your lame reference is just self-serving, and flatulant.
But then, we all know you are full of gas, you twerp.

> You are psychologiclly sick beyond help -neocon rabid.

Coming from you, I just have to laugh out loud.

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:yK%cf.102054$S4.49160@edtnps84...
> In article <8pYcf.535934$_o.287897@attbi_s71>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:_tXcf.102035$S4.16449@edtnps84...
>> > In article <%2Vcf.318485$084.143280@attbi_s22>,
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
>> >> news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
>> >> > dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> >> > news:8qQcf.137852
>> >> > $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> >> saying
>> >> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> Syrian border.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> >> kill
>> >> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> >> out
>> >> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> >> > believe
>> >> > that
>> >> > too ?
>> >>
>> >> What that means is that we are making life difficult for the
>> >> insurgency,
>> >> and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing
>> >> something
>> >> right.
>> >>
>> >> George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter as
>> >> it
>> >> hits the floor of his spiderhole>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > That's wrong in so many ways, it's hard to know where to start.
>>
>> How about starting at the facts?  You seem to have difficulty doing
>> this.
>>
>> > Obviously you haven't ever followed your assumptions past the next few
>> > steps. Look at the US now. Divided (you are in the minority dude)
>>
>> Yes, we democrats are in the minority.  There's no doubt about that.
>> But
>> that is changing, slowly.
>>
>> > broke(Bush has borrowed more money -against your children- than the
>> > last
>> > 42 presidents combined, and from communist China, Saudia Arabia), more
>> > than 2000 US homes have a flag instead of a spouse, a parent or an
>> > offspring, etc, etc. Ah, why bother with you fools.
>>
>> Of course, this rant is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not
>> Zarqawi
>> is getting desparate in his attacks because we are squeezing his pals
>> along
>> the Syrian border (which was the issue I brought up, if you can focus
>> that
>> one brain cell of yours long enough to recall).  I recall that he
>> demanded
>> just today, after he attacked a wedding party in Amman Jordan and two
>> other
>> hotels (for some damned reason, he killed a bunch of Jordanians and some
>> Palestinians as well, including a high level Hammas official), that the
>> U.S. withdraw from the fighting along the Syrian border.  Now exactly
>> why
>> would he make such a demand if we weren't causing his pals a lot of
>> trouble
>> there?  The fact is that we are, and that is why he's shitting in his
>> pants
>> as we speak.  But don't sweat it.  It isn't like you've put your sorry
>> ass
>> on the line for anyone in your life.  All you have to do is sit behind
>> that
>> monitor at that little internet cafe you frequent and whine on and one
>> until your dick falls off.  Oh, by the way.  Wipe the mess off the
>> monitor
>> when you are finished.
>>
>>

I don't have a vested interest other than a human concern to
> stop the killing of innocent people.

Right.  Like when one of Zarqawi's boy blew up children who were getting
candy from Marines? I'm sure you were so concerned that you went online and
complained that the soldiers put them in harms way instead of complaining
that your Wahabbi pals had just slaughtered a group of children for no
reason other than sheer meanness.

> Why is it rightwingers think all they have to do is kill enough people,
> and it's going to bring them peace?

I don't know.  You could ask a rightwinger.  Or you could ask the Japanese.
They figured out when to quit.  When are you and your Wahabbi buddies going
to figure it out?

George

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:Rz%cf.102053$S4.95437@edtnps84...
> In article <boXcf.535877$_o.191800@attbi_s71>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84...
>> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
>> > Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> >> news:8qQcf.137852
>> >> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> > saying
>> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> > the
>> >> > Syrian border.
>> >> >
>> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> > kill
>> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >
>> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> > out
>> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> >> believe
>> >> that
>> >> too ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
>> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven
>> > pathological
>> > liars when it comes to the war.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > the dang
>>
>> Yet you are perfectly willing to go along with Wahabbis who fly jumbo
>> jets
>> into skyscrapers.  I'm not surprised.
>>
>
> Where's Osama. 6'7" or so, on dyalisis for christ's sake.
> Yet they can find Saddam in a hole in the ground. But none of the
> hyjackers were from Iraq.

Saddam was a dumbass, not unlike you.

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:40:28 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
<notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:

>In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >Syrian border.
>> >
>> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >
>> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>>
>> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
>> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
>> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
>> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
>> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
>> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>
>
>Pretending to care for the Iraqis - the bs rightwing party line.

The michaelmoore left you speak so eloquently for would prefer to
abandon the Iraqis to Zarqawi & Co., or, better yet, another Saddam.

argos

dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
news:Ps%cf.102052$S4.92162@edtnps84:

> In article <Xns970B16925703Eewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
>  Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84:
>>
>> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
>> >  Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> >> news:8qQcf.137852 $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> > saying they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns
>> >> > along the Syrian border.
>> >> >
>> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> > kill a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >
>> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> > out of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> >> believe that too ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
>> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven
>> > pathological liars when it comes to the war.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Bend over wangnoodle - Osamas got a woody for you, and he would like to
>> show you his appreciation for all of your fine support on the usenet.
>> The day will come when we will launch a shit seeking missle over your
>> town, and it will home in straight on your empty skull.
>
>
> Got ya. Word homo-erotic spins Jesse into his anal dreams. I'll bet if
> they ever get around to disecting rightwing brains, they'll find one big
> area reserved for their fingers up their anus.

Ok dipdoodle, I'll keep that in mind as I laugh at your utter lameness.
Your entertainment value is even waning.

>
> http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?idG11
>

Told ya, save yourself the bother.
I will never, ever click one of your links [probably to gay porn].

In article <YvXcf.528935$x96.113202@attbi_s72>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:V2Xcf.102030$S4.47127@edtnps84...
> > In article <3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net>, "Jim  E" <YD641387@SEA.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
> >> >
> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> > Syrian border.
> >> >
> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> > kill
> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >
> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> >> > the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
> >> > people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
> >> > menstral
> >> > blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> >> > democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
> >> >
> >> > Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
> >> > out
> >> > people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
> >> >
> >> > If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
> >> > caused
> >> > the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Another appeasement coward heard from.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It's not all that difficult. If you do something and you get negative
> > results, stop doing it and try something different.
>
> Even if one's goal is negative results (i.e., a lot of dead terrorists)?  I
> think we will continue to have negative results.  Don't you?  Oh wait.
> That's a positive result.  Nevermind.  :-)
>
> George<watching Dugoutnoodleo go into spastic afternirth mode>
>
>
Why can't you focus on the dead american soldiers for two seconds? You
know, they're the ones paying for your blind support of the war.


--
the dang

In article <YvXcf.528935$x96.113202@attbi_s72>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:V2Xcf.102030$S4.47127@edtnps84...
> > In article <3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net>, "Jim  E" <YD641387@SEA.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
> >> >
> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> > Syrian border.
> >> >
> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> > kill
> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >
> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and stop
> >> > the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys, covering
> >> > people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
> >> > menstral
> >> > blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka, spreading
> >> > democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
> >> >
> >> > Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is wiping
> >> > out
> >> > people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
> >> >
> >> > If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
> >> > caused
> >> > the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Another appeasement coward heard from.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It's not all that difficult. If you do something and you get negative
> > results, stop doing it and try something different.
>
> Even if one's goal is negative results (i.e., a lot of dead terrorists)?  I
> think we will continue to have negative results.  Don't you?  Oh wait.
> That's a positive result.  Nevermind.  :-)
>
> George<watching Dugoutnoodleo go into spastic afternirth mode>

As long as you're marking success by the number of dead (sic), you might
as well count them all.

--
the dang

In article <dhu9n1p37iblq4nprubc76h6t2qc4mq2i7@4ax.com>,
 argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:40:28 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> >Syrian border.
> >> >
> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >
> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >>
> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
> >
> >
> >Pretending to care for the Iraqis - the bs rightwing party line.
>
> The michaelmoore left you speak so eloquently for would prefer to
> abandon the Iraqis to Zarqawi & Co., or, better yet, another Saddam.
>
> argos

As opposed to our side killing them? Sure. How about you? You like those
US puppet governments that always backfire against the US?

--
the dang

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:itbdf.102229$S4.15696@edtnps84...
> In article <YvXcf.528935$x96.113202@attbi_s72>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:V2Xcf.102030$S4.47127@edtnps84...
>> > In article <3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net>, "Jim  E"
>> > <YD641387@SEA.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>> >> >
>> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> > saying
>> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> > the
>> >> > Syrian border.
>> >> >
>> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> > kill
>> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >
>> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> > out
>> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and
>> >> > stop
>> >> > the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys,
>> >> > covering
>> >> > people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>> >> > menstral
>> >> > blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka,
>> >> > spreading
>> >> > democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>> >> >
>> >> > Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is
>> >> > wiping
>> >> > out
>> >> > people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>> >> >
>> >> > If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>> >> > caused
>> >> > the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > It's not all that difficult. If you do something and you get negative
>> > results, stop doing it and try something different.
>>
>> Even if one's goal is negative results (i.e., a lot of dead terrorists)?
>> I
>> think we will continue to have negative results.  Don't you?  Oh wait.
>> That's a positive result.  Nevermind.  :-)
>>
>> George<watching Dugoutnoodleo go into spastic afternirth mode>
>>
>>
> Why can't you focus on the dead american soldiers for two seconds? You
> know, they're the ones paying for your blind support of the war.
>
>
> --
> the dang

Just because I support the war and the soldiers doesn't mean that I am
blind.  On the contrary. Ok, now for thoughts about our soldiers.  Today
was Veterans day, and I gave a check to the DAV.  End of story.

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:DTbdf.102239$S4.37953@edtnps84...
> In article <YvXcf.528935$x96.113202@attbi_s72>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:V2Xcf.102030$S4.47127@edtnps84...
>> > In article <3tik30Fstmn7U1@individual.net>, "Jim  E"
>> > <YD641387@SEA.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:8qQcf.137852$Io.98830@clgrps13...
>> >> >
>> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> > saying
>> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> > the
>> >> > Syrian border.
>> >> >
>> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
>> >> > kill
>> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >
>> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
>> >> > out
>> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Of course the US would have to close down the secret prisons and
>> >> > stop
>> >> > the homo-erotic torturing too. No more; raping little boys,
>> >> > covering
>> >> > people in shit, electricity to the genitals, smeering people in
>> >> > menstral
>> >> > blood, baseball bats to the legs and stuff like that. (aka,
>> >> > spreading
>> >> > democracy) -and we weren't even allowed to see all the photos.
>> >> >
>> >> > Torturing others is probably a hard addiction to break. So is
>> >> > wiping
>> >> > out
>> >> > people in towns which may or may not contain a few Al Queda.
>> >> >
>> >> > If George Bush wants to help the Jordanians catch the people who
>> >> > caused
>> >> > the bombings, he could just look in the mirror.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Another appeasement coward heard from.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > It's not all that difficult. If you do something and you get negative
>> > results, stop doing it and try something different.
>>
>> Even if one's goal is negative results (i.e., a lot of dead terrorists)?
>> I
>> think we will continue to have negative results.  Don't you?  Oh wait.
>> That's a positive result.  Nevermind.  :-)
>>
>> George<watching Dugoutnoodleo go into spastic afternirth mode>
>
> As long as you're marking success by the number of dead (sic), you might
> as well count them all.
>
> --
> the dang

Ok:

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/database/

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/

In article <080df.529238$x96.25102@attbi_s72>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:HT%cf.102056$S4.68892@edtnps84...
> > In article <xcYcf.535922$_o.91106@attbi_s71>,
> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
> >> > In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> >> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> >> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> >> >Syrian border.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> >> >kill
> >> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
> >> >> >out
> >> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >>
> >> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> >> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the
> >> >> nation
> >> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> >> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> >> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
> >> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?
> >>
> >> Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding
> >> in
> >> Amman, are you?
> >>
> > The US has bombed at least 2 weddings.
> > www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051020_between_a_hard_place.htm
>
> So you ARE justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
> Amman, aren't you?  I guess that makes you a coward as well.  Since the US
> doesn't do these things intentionally, and Zarqawi DOES, and with malace
> and forethought, your lame reference is just self-serving, and flatulant.
> But then, we all know you are full of gas, you twerp.
>
> > You are psychologiclly sick beyond help -neocon rabid.
>
> Coming from you, I just have to laugh out loud.
>
>

There's a much better chance the US knew there were weddings going on in
both case I'm refering to because they have all kinds of tech, even to
see through walls, etc. Geeze, you're still in fairy tales land, 1 hr
cop show where the US good guy always wins at about 5 minutes to. Wake
up dude. A lot of those guys that are there joined because they wanted
to kill, and it really doesn't matter who goes down.
Your diagnosis stands.


--
the dang

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:53:15 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
<notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:

>In article <dhu9n1p37iblq4nprubc76h6t2qc4mq2i7@4ax.com>,
> argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:40:28 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
>> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
>> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
>> >> >Syrian border.
>> >> >
>> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and kill
>> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >
>> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
>> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >>
>> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
>> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
>> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
>> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
>> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
>> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>> >
>> >
>> >Pretending to care for the Iraqis - the bs rightwing party line.
>>
>> The michaelmoore left you speak so eloquently for would prefer to
>> abandon the Iraqis to Zarqawi & Co., or, better yet, another Saddam.
>>
>> argos
>
>As opposed to our side killing them?

"Our" side?  Oh, that's right, you're a blame-America-first leftist!
Goodie for you.  But I'm immune to your brand of canned propaganda --
rolls right off me -- sorry!

>Sure. How about you? You like those
>US puppet governments that always backfire against the US?

Forget the worn-out puppet bit.  I'm for free government in Iraq.
Period.  I am for the people of Iraq choosing for themselves who will
lead them and what style of government their society will depend on
(so long as it is free and ultimately based on the active will of the
people).  What I do NOT want to see (but which your side could not
care less about) is the return of another violent self-aggrandizing
fascist like Saddam (your hero); nor would I wish to see the people of
Iraq given over to the amusement of death-cult terror gangs, like what
we have had in the Palestinian territories for several decades.

argos

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:2Hhdf.102313$S4.15843@edtnps84...
> In article <080df.529238$x96.25102@attbi_s72>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:HT%cf.102056$S4.68892@edtnps84...
>> > In article <xcYcf.535922$_o.91106@attbi_s71>,
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
>> >> > In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
>> >> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> >> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> >> >saying
>> >> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >Syrian border.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns
>> >> >> >and
>> >> >> >kill
>> >> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the
>> >> >> >hell
>> >> >> >out
>> >> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
>> >> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the
>> >> >> nation
>> >> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
>> >> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
>> >> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding
>> >> >> celebrations --
>> >> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?
>> >>
>> >> Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a
>> >> wedding
>> >> in
>> >> Amman, are you?
>> >>
>> > The US has bombed at least 2 weddings.
>> > www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051020_between_a_hard_place.htm
>>
>> So you ARE justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
>> Amman, aren't you?  I guess that makes you a coward as well.  Since the
>> US
>> doesn't do these things intentionally, and Zarqawi DOES, and with malace
>> and forethought, your lame reference is just self-serving, and
>> flatulant.
>> But then, we all know you are full of gas, you twerp.
>>
>> > You are psychologiclly sick beyond help -neocon rabid.
>>
>> Coming from you, I just have to laugh out loud.
>>
>>
>
> There's a much better chance the US knew there were weddings going on in
> both case I'm refering to because they have all kinds of tech, even to
> see through walls, etc. Geeze, you're still in fairy tales land, 1 hr
> cop show where the US good guy always wins at about 5 minutes to. Wake
> up dude. A lot of those guys that are there joined because they wanted
> to kill, and it really doesn't matter who goes down.
> Your diagnosis stands.
>
>
> --
> the dang

Umm, just because the CIA or NSA may have such devices doesn't mean that
military units in the field have or ever used them in these cases.  In at
aleast one case that I know of, the wedding party was attacked after they
were seen to shoot machine gun rounds in the sky (the explanation which was
given was that apparently Arabs like to shoot weapons into the air at
weddings in celebration) at a time when U.S. planes were in the area.  The
U.S. explanation was that the pilots thought that they were being shot at,
and I see no reason to doubt that they believed that there was a threat.
That is a far cry from four Iraqis working for Zarqawi casing three hotels
out for a month, and then walking into them and setting off belt bombs.
They knew exactly what they were doing and intended to cause maximum death
and instruction.  But don't let faces prevent you from making an ass out of
yourself.  Go for it, Horacio-noodle-spew.

In article <6iccn1h55qeku5t9v4ug3g1558cdf415ra@4ax.com>,
 argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:53:15 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <dhu9n1p37iblq4nprubc76h6t2qc4mq2i7@4ax.com>,
> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:40:28 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> >> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> >> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan, saying
> >> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along the
> >> >> >Syrian border.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> >> >kill
> >> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell out
> >> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >>
> >> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> >> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the nation
> >> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> >> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> >> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding celebrations --
> >> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Pretending to care for the Iraqis - the bs rightwing party line.
> >>
> >> The michaelmoore left you speak so eloquently for would prefer to
> >> abandon the Iraqis to Zarqawi & Co., or, better yet, another Saddam.
> >>
> >> argos
> >
> >As opposed to our side killing them?
>
> "Our" side?  Oh, that's right, you're a blame-America-first leftist!
> Goodie for you.  But I'm immune to your brand of canned propaganda --
> rolls right off me -- sorry!
>
> >Sure. How about you? You like those
> >US puppet governments that always backfire against the US?
>
> Forget the worn-out puppet bit.  I'm for free government in Iraq.
> Period.  I am for the people of Iraq choosing for themselves who will
> lead them and what style of government their society will depend on
> (so long as it is free and ultimately based on the active will of the
> people).  What I do NOT want to see (but which your side could not
> care less about) is the return of another violent self-aggrandizing
> fascist like Saddam (your hero);


Well that's what you've got, but only him and his buddies are in the
whitehouse. Satisfied?




nor would I wish to see the people of
> Iraq given over to the amusement of death-cult terror gangs, like what
> we have had in the Palestinian territories for several decades.
>
> argos

Now they're corporate owned. Big deal.

--
the dang

In article <af0df.529246$x96.467521@attbi_s72>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:yK%cf.102054$S4.49160@edtnps84...
> > In article <8pYcf.535934$_o.287897@attbi_s71>,
> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:_tXcf.102035$S4.16449@edtnps84...
> >> > In article <%2Vcf.318485$084.143280@attbi_s22>,
> >> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
> >> >> news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
> >> >> > dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
> >> >> > news:8qQcf.137852
> >> >> > $Io.98830@clgrps13:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
> >> >> >> saying
> >> >> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> Syrian border.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> >> >> kill
> >> >> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
> >> >> >> out
> >> >> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
> >> >> > believe
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > too ?
> >> >>
> >> >> What that means is that we are making life difficult for the
> >> >> insurgency,
> >> >> and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing
> >> >> something
> >> >> right.
> >> >>
> >> >> George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter as
> >> >> it
> >> >> hits the floor of his spiderhole>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > That's wrong in so many ways, it's hard to know where to start.
> >>
> >> How about starting at the facts?  You seem to have difficulty doing
> >> this.
> >>
> >> > Obviously you haven't ever followed your assumptions past the next few
> >> > steps. Look at the US now. Divided (you are in the minority dude)
> >>
> >> Yes, we democrats are in the minority.  There's no doubt about that.
> >> But
> >> that is changing, slowly.
> >>
> >> > broke(Bush has borrowed more money -against your children- than the
> >> > last
> >> > 42 presidents combined, and from communist China, Saudia Arabia), more
> >> > than 2000 US homes have a flag instead of a spouse, a parent or an
> >> > offspring, etc, etc. Ah, why bother with you fools.
> >>
> >> Of course, this rant is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not
> >> Zarqawi
> >> is getting desparate in his attacks because we are squeezing his pals
> >> along
> >> the Syrian border (which was the issue I brought up, if you can focus
> >> that
> >> one brain cell of yours long enough to recall).  I recall that he
> >> demanded
> >> just today, after he attacked a wedding party in Amman Jordan and two
> >> other
> >> hotels (for some damned reason, he killed a bunch of Jordanians and some
> >> Palestinians as well, including a high level Hammas official), that the
> >> U.S. withdraw from the fighting along the Syrian border.  Now exactly
> >> why
> >> would he make such a demand if we weren't causing his pals a lot of
> >> trouble
> >> there?  The fact is that we are, and that is why he's shitting in his
> >> pants
> >> as we speak.  But don't sweat it.  It isn't like you've put your sorry
> >> ass
> >> on the line for anyone in your life.  All you have to do is sit behind
> >> that
> >> monitor at that little internet cafe you frequent and whine on and one
> >> until your dick falls off.  Oh, by the way.  Wipe the mess off the
> >> monitor
> >> when you are finished.
> >>
> >>
>
> I don't have a vested interest other than a human concern to
> > stop the killing of innocent people.
>
> Right.  Like when one of Zarqawi's boy blew up children who were getting
> candy from Marines? I'm sure you were so concerned that you went online and
> complained that the soldiers put them in harms way instead of complaining
> that your Wahabbi pals had just slaughtered a group of children for no
> reason other than sheer meanness.


The US was dropping exploding candy-looking-pakages there for a while
there too.

Regardless, starving people and then "buying" the kids with candy is
quite dispicable enough.


>
> > Why is it rightwingers think all they have to do is kill enough people,
> > and it's going to bring them peace?
>
> I don't know.  You could ask a rightwinger.  Or you could ask the Japanese.
> They figured out when to quit.  When are you and your Wahabbi buddies going
> to figure it out?
>
> George
>
>
Really. I'm sure you've "inspired" a great many people against the US,
when they read you're ignorant onesided "Americans have a right to
torture, imprison, or kill who ever it wants" rants.


--
the dang

In article <x3qdf.537992$_o.293667@attbi_s71>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:2Hhdf.102313$S4.15843@edtnps84...
> > In article <080df.529238$x96.25102@attbi_s72>,
> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:HT%cf.102056$S4.68892@edtnps84...
> >> > In article <xcYcf.535922$_o.91106@attbi_s71>,
> >> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
> >> >> > In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
> >> >> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
> >> >> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
> >> >> >> >saying
> >> >> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
> >> >> >> >the
> >> >> >> >Syrian border.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns
> >> >> >> >and
> >> >> >> >kill
> >> >> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the
> >> >> >> >hell
> >> >> >> >out
> >> >> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their new
> >> >> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the
> >> >> >> nation
> >> >> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers in
> >> >> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden satchel
> >> >> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding
> >> >> >> celebrations --
> >> >> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?
> >> >>
> >> >> Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a
> >> >> wedding
> >> >> in
> >> >> Amman, are you?
> >> >>
> >> > The US has bombed at least 2 weddings.
> >> > www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051020_between_a_hard_place.htm
> >>
> >> So you ARE justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
> >> Amman, aren't you?  I guess that makes you a coward as well.  Since the
> >> US
> >> doesn't do these things intentionally, and Zarqawi DOES, and with malace
> >> and forethought, your lame reference is just self-serving, and
> >> flatulant.
> >> But then, we all know you are full of gas, you twerp.
> >>
> >> > You are psychologiclly sick beyond help -neocon rabid.
> >>
> >> Coming from you, I just have to laugh out loud.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > There's a much better chance the US knew there were weddings going on in
> > both case I'm refering to because they have all kinds of tech, even to
> > see through walls, etc. Geeze, you're still in fairy tales land, 1 hr
> > cop show where the US good guy always wins at about 5 minutes to. Wake
> > up dude. A lot of those guys that are there joined because they wanted
> > to kill, and it really doesn't matter who goes down.
> > Your diagnosis stands.
> >
> >
> > --
> > the dang
>
> Umm, just because the CIA or NSA may have such devices doesn't mean that
> military units in the field have or ever used them in these cases.  In at
> aleast one case that I know of, the wedding party was attacked after they
> were seen to shoot machine gun rounds in the sky (the explanation which was
> given was that apparently Arabs like to shoot weapons into the air at
> weddings in celebration) at a time when U.S. planes were in the area.  The
> U.S. explanation was that the pilots thought that they were being shot at,
> and I see no reason to doubt that they believed that there was a threat.

Of course you wouldn't, cause you're an ignorant asshole that puts the
party line before the truth.



> That is a far cry from four Iraqis working for Zarqawi casing three hotels
> out for a month, and then walking into them and setting off belt bombs.
> They knew exactly what they were doing and intended to cause maximum death
> and instruction.  But don't let faces prevent you from making an ass out of
> yourself.  Go for it, Horacio-noodle-spew.

Zarqawi doesn't have planes to drop bombs, nor the media spin to wash
away guilt, so he uses belt bombs. Pretty much the same outcome as far
as I can see.


>
>



--
the dang

"For the US, Iraq is a black hole. It has sucked lives, money, values,
 principles, and the minds of all Bush supporters.

And all are NOT coming back."
"Did I mention your good name is gone too."

In article <Gg0df.529248$x96.52576@attbi_s72>,
 "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:

> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> news:Rz%cf.102053$S4.95437@edtnps84...
> > In article <boXcf.535877$_o.191800@attbi_s71>,
> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84...
> >> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
> >> > Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:8qQcf.137852
> >> >> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
> >> >> > saying
> >> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > Syrian border.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns and
> >> >> > kill
> >> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the hell
> >> >> > out
> >> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
> >> >> believe
> >> >> that
> >> >> too ?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from the
> >> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven
> >> > pathological
> >> > liars when it comes to the war.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > the dang
> >>
> >> Yet you are perfectly willing to go along with Wahabbis who fly jumbo
> >> jets
> >> into skyscrapers.  I'm not surprised.
> >>
> >
> > Where's Osama. 6'7" or so, on dyalisis for christ's sake.
> > Yet they can find Saddam in a hole in the ground. But none of the
> > hyjackers were from Iraq.
>
> Saddam was a dumbass, not unlike you.

Well apparently Saddam told the truth about WMDs, while Bush lied. You
mean he was dumb because he told the truth?


>
>



--
the dang

"For the US, Iraq is a black hole. It has sucked lives, money, values,
 principles, and the minds of all Bush supporters.

And all are NOT coming back."
"Did I mention your good name is gone too."

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:LpEdf.141718$Io.26732@clgrps13...
> In article <x3qdf.537992$_o.293667@attbi_s71>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:2Hhdf.102313$S4.15843@edtnps84...
>> > In article <080df.529238$x96.25102@attbi_s72>,
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:HT%cf.102056$S4.68892@edtnps84...
>> >> > In article <xcYcf.535922$_o.91106@attbi_s71>,
>> >> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:eYXcf.102036$S4.35004@edtnps84...
>> >> >> > In article <4no7n1pu2rd1da46p8nmjc5objvihqluv1@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> > argos <nodog@volcanomail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:08:52 GMT, dangdangdoodle3
>> >> >> >> <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> >> >> >saying
>> >> >> >> >they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns
>> >> >> >> >along
>> >> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >> >Syrian border.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns
>> >> >> >> >and
>> >> >> >> >kill
>> >> >> >> >a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the
>> >> >> >> >hell
>> >> >> >> >out
>> >> >> >> >of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> That would be a betrayal of our Iraqi friends who want their
>> >> >> >> new
>> >> >> >> democratic nation to survive.  If the US "got the hell out" the
>> >> >> >> nation
>> >> >> >> would be left to the mercy of men who slaughter school teachers
>> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> front of their young students, who detonate shrapnel-laden
>> >> >> >> satchel
>> >> >> >> bombs in crowded Iraqi eateries and Jordanian wedding
>> >> >> >> celebrations --
>> >> >> >> YOUR kind of 'freedom fighters', I dare say.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How many weddings and eateries have the US bombed?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gee, so now you are justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a
>> >> >> wedding
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> Amman, are you?
>> >> >>
>> >> > The US has bombed at least 2 weddings.
>> >> > www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_richard__051020_between_a_hard_place.htm
>> >>
>> >> So you ARE justifying Zarqawi's cowardly bombing of a wedding in
>> >> Amman, aren't you?  I guess that makes you a coward as well.  Since
>> >> the
>> >> US
>> >> doesn't do these things intentionally, and Zarqawi DOES, and with
>> >> malace
>> >> and forethought, your lame reference is just self-serving, and
>> >> flatulant.
>> >> But then, we all know you are full of gas, you twerp.
>> >>
>> >> > You are psychologiclly sick beyond help -neocon rabid.
>> >>
>> >> Coming from you, I just have to laugh out loud.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > There's a much better chance the US knew there were weddings going on
>> > in
>> > both case I'm refering to because they have all kinds of tech, even to
>> > see through walls, etc. Geeze, you're still in fairy tales land, 1 hr
>> > cop show where the US good guy always wins at about 5 minutes to. Wake
>> > up dude. A lot of those guys that are there joined because they wanted
>> > to kill, and it really doesn't matter who goes down.
>> > Your diagnosis stands.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > the dang
>>
>> Umm, just because the CIA or NSA may have such devices doesn't mean that
>> military units in the field have or ever used them in these cases.  In
>> at
>> aleast one case that I know of, the wedding party was attacked after
>> they
>> were seen to shoot machine gun rounds in the sky (the explanation which
>> was
>> given was that apparently Arabs like to shoot weapons into the air at
>> weddings in celebration) at a time when U.S. planes were in the area.
>> The
>> U.S. explanation was that the pilots thought that they were being shot
>> at,
>> and I see no reason to doubt that they believed that there was a threat.
>
> Of course you wouldn't, cause you're an ignorant asshole that puts the
> party line before the truth.

Apparently, all you have is ad hominems and baseless accusations.  So, what
party line are you following, Herr Himlerberrynoodle?

>> That is a far cry from four Iraqis working for Zarqawi casing three
>> hotels
>> out for a month, and then walking into them and setting off belt bombs.
>> They knew exactly what they were doing and intended to cause maximum
>> death
>> and instruction.  But don't let faces prevent you from making an ass out
>> of
>> yourself.  Go for it, Horacio-noodle-spew.
>
> Zarqawi doesn't have planes to drop bombs, nor the media spin to wash
> away guilt, so he uses belt bombs.

And you, of course, sit behind your monitor in your dreary little room, and
cheer him on like the pathetic Wahabbi spew that you are.

George

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:WkEdf.141717$Io.43030@clgrps13...
> In article <af0df.529246$x96.467521@attbi_s72>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:yK%cf.102054$S4.49160@edtnps84...
>> > In article <8pYcf.535934$_o.287897@attbi_s71>,
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:_tXcf.102035$S4.16449@edtnps84...
>> >> > In article <%2Vcf.318485$084.143280@attbi_s22>,
>> >> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Jesse" <zo@so.org> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130...
>> >> >> > dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> >> >> > news:8qQcf.137852
>> >> >> > $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> >> >> saying
>> >> >> >> they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns
>> >> >> >> along
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> Syrian border.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns
>> >> >> >> and
>> >> >> >> kill
>> >> >> >> a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the
>> >> >> >> hell
>> >> >> >> out
>> >> >> >> of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> >> >> > believe
>> >> >> > that
>> >> >> > too ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What that means is that we are making life difficult for the
>> >> >> insurgency,
>> >> >> and their Syrian supporters, and also means that we are doing
>> >> >> something
>> >> >> right.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> George<listening to the drip of sweat from Zarqawi's face splatter
>> >> >> as
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> hits the floor of his spiderhole>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > That's wrong in so many ways, it's hard to know where to start.
>> >>
>> >> How about starting at the facts?  You seem to have difficulty doing
>> >> this.
>> >>
>> >> > Obviously you haven't ever followed your assumptions past the next
>> >> > few
>> >> > steps. Look at the US now. Divided (you are in the minority dude)
>> >>
>> >> Yes, we democrats are in the minority.  There's no doubt about that.
>> >> But
>> >> that is changing, slowly.
>> >>
>> >> > broke(Bush has borrowed more money -against your children- than the
>> >> > last
>> >> > 42 presidents combined, and from communist China, Saudia Arabia),
>> >> > more
>> >> > than 2000 US homes have a flag instead of a spouse, a parent or an
>> >> > offspring, etc, etc. Ah, why bother with you fools.
>> >>
>> >> Of course, this rant is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not
>> >> Zarqawi
>> >> is getting desparate in his attacks because we are squeezing his pals
>> >> along
>> >> the Syrian border (which was the issue I brought up, if you can focus
>> >> that
>> >> one brain cell of yours long enough to recall).  I recall that he
>> >> demanded
>> >> just today, after he attacked a wedding party in Amman Jordan and two
>> >> other
>> >> hotels (for some damned reason, he killed a bunch of Jordanians and
>> >> some
>> >> Palestinians as well, including a high level Hammas official), that
>> >> the
>> >> U.S. withdraw from the fighting along the Syrian border.  Now exactly
>> >> why
>> >> would he make such a demand if we weren't causing his pals a lot of
>> >> trouble
>> >> there?  The fact is that we are, and that is why he's shitting in his
>> >> pants
>> >> as we speak.  But don't sweat it.  It isn't like you've put your
>> >> sorry
>> >> ass
>> >> on the line for anyone in your life.  All you have to do is sit
>> >> behind
>> >> that
>> >> monitor at that little internet cafe you frequent and whine on and
>> >> one
>> >> until your dick falls off.  Oh, by the way.  Wipe the mess off the
>> >> monitor
>> >> when you are finished.
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> I don't have a vested interest other than a human concern to
>> > stop the killing of innocent people.
>>
>> Right.  Like when one of Zarqawi's boy blew up children who were getting
>> candy from Marines? I'm sure you were so concerned that you went online
>> and
>> complained that the soldiers put them in harms way instead of
>> complaining
>> that your Wahabbi pals had just slaughtered a group of children for no
>> reason other than sheer meanness.
>
>
> The US was dropping exploding candy-looking-pakages there for a while
> there too.

More lies from the Baghdad Bob fan club.

> Regardless, starving people and then "buying" the kids with candy is
> quite dispicable enough.

Wahhabbiinoodle, you've got your AFDB on inside out:

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

>>
>> > Why is it rightwingers think all they have to do is kill enough
>> > people,
>> > and it's going to bring them peace?
>>
>> I don't know.  You could ask a rightwinger.  Or you could ask the
>> Japanese.
>> They figured out when to quit.  When are you and your Wahabbi buddies
>> going
>> to figure it out?
>>
>> George
>>
>>
> Really. I'm sure you've "inspired" a great many people against the US,
> when they read you're ignorant onesided "Americans have a right to
> torture, imprison, or kill who ever it wants" rants.

So what inspired you to go online and profess disloyalty to your own
country, and join the Wahabbis in their hatred and madness?

George

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:zrEdf.141720$Io.80272@clgrps13...
> In article <Gg0df.529248$x96.52576@attbi_s72>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:Rz%cf.102053$S4.95437@edtnps84...
>> > In article <boXcf.535877$_o.191800@attbi_s71>,
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84...
>> >> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
>> >> > Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:8qQcf.137852
>> >> >> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> >> > saying
>> >> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > Syrian border.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > kill
>> >> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the
>> >> >> > hell
>> >> >> > out
>> >> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> >> >> believe
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> too ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from
>> >> > the
>> >> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven
>> >> > pathological
>> >> > liars when it comes to the war.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > the dang
>> >>
>> >> Yet you are perfectly willing to go along with Wahabbis who fly jumbo
>> >> jets
>> >> into skyscrapers.  I'm not surprised.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Where's Osama. 6'7" or so, on dyalisis for christ's sake.
>> > Yet they can find Saddam in a hole in the ground. But none of the
>> > hyjackers were from Iraq.
>>
>> Saddam was a dumbass, not unlike you.
>
> Well apparently Saddam told the truth about WMDs, while Bush lied. You
> mean he was dumb because he told the truth?

Did he now?  And you know this because?

"dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
news:zrEdf.141720$Io.80272@clgrps13...
> In article <Gg0df.529248$x96.52576@attbi_s72>,
> "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> news:Rz%cf.102053$S4.95437@edtnps84...
>> > In article <boXcf.535877$_o.191800@attbi_s71>,
>> > "George" <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dangdangdoodle3" <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:nkXcf.102033$S4.91570@edtnps84...
>> >> > In article <Xns970AEBADC28EAewrfdgrstnetaakeanfk@140.99.99.130>,
>> >> > Jesse <zo@so.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> dangdangdoodle3 <notea_thanks@islandnet.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:8qQcf.137852
>> >> >> $Io.98830@clgrps13:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The Al Queda claim responsibility for the bombings in Jordan,
>> >> >> > saying
>> >> >> > they were in retaliation for the US attacks on Iraqi towns along
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > Syrian border.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That apparently means that if the US didn't attack those towns
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > kill
>> >> >> > a lot of people, then Jordan would've been left alone.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Geeze, wonder if all the attacks would stop if the US got the
>> >> >> > hell
>> >> >> > out
>> >> >> > of where they don't belong. It'd be a start anyway.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> If Al Queda told you that you got a cute little butt, would you
>> >> >> believe
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> too ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Unlike you, I certainly wouldn't believe anything that came from
>> >> > the
>> >> > Bush crime family, including Blair, all of whom are proven
>> >> > pathological
>> >> > liars when it comes to the war.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > the dang
>> >>
>> >> Yet you are perfectly willing to go along with Wahabbis who fly jumbo
>> >> jets
>> >> into skyscrapers.  I'm not surprised.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Where's Osama. 6'7" or so, on dyalisis for christ's sake.
>> > Yet they can find Saddam in a hole in the ground. But none of the
>> > hyjackers were from Iraq.
>>
>> Saddam was a dumbass, not unlike you.
>
> Well apparently Saddam told the truth about WMDs, while Bush lied. You
> mean he was dumb because he told the truth?
>

Did he now?  And you know this because?  Think about it, beltbombnoodleO.
The same guys who you claim have lied about going to war for WMDs are the
same guys who now say that there were no WMDs.  If they lied before, why
are they "telling the truth" now?  Why did they stop "lying"?  If you
insist that it was a lie, and you are used to governments lying to you, why
did they stop lying to you now?  If they were truly dishonest, why didn't
they just take a picture of a camel with a nuke strapped to its back, take
the picture to Kinkos, make a bunch of copies to give to the media, and
declare that they had found the WMDs???

George

>If they were truly dishonest, why didn't
>they just take a picture of a camel with a nuke strapped to its back, take
>the picture to Kinkos, make a bunch of copies to give to the media, and
>declare that they had found the WMDs???

The american government practically did, remember? Colin Powell showed
all those sattelite photos of chemical weapons plants, and the
hysterical diagrams of the mobile chemical plants hidden in the back of
trucks. Granted there are many buildings you might mistake for chemical
plants, but I do not believe that the american government could have
seriously believed thier own claims about the trucks.
Even if someone had no knowledge of this field of science, they still
must of realised that no government, no matter how insane, would give
the go-ahead for such a scheme. I have only a basic knowledge of
chemical weapons manufacture but I can still tell it would be nigh-on
impossible to carry out such dangerous work in such conditions, let
alone find some suicidal scientists to do it.

As far as I care they may as well have shown a nuke strapped to a
camel, at least then the more gullible among us would have been able to
tell Bush and co were lying to us.

"Silent Bob" <liam.campbell@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1131968569.895066.12980@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >If they were truly dishonest, why didn't
>>they just take a picture of a camel with a nuke strapped to its back,
>>take
>>the picture to Kinkos, make a bunch of copies to give to the media, and
>>declare that they had found the WMDs???
>
> The american government practically did, remember? Colin Powell showed
> all those sattelite photos of chemical weapons plants, and the
> hysterical diagrams of the mobile chemical plants hidden in the back of
> trucks. Granted there are many buildings you might mistake for chemical
> plants, but I do not believe that the american government could have
> seriously believed thier own claims about the trucks.
> Even if someone had no knowledge of this field of science, they still
> must of realised that no government, no matter how insane, would give
> the go-ahead for such a scheme. I have only a basic knowledge of
> chemical weapons manufacture but I can still tell it would be nigh-on
> impossible to carry out such dangerous work in such conditions, let
> alone find some suicidal scientists to do it.
>
> As far as I care they may as well have shown a nuke strapped to a
> camel, at least then the more gullible among us would have been able to
> tell Bush and co were lying to us.

I think you are missing the point.  If they were lying to us, why did they
suddenly stop?  Saddam Hussein was known to have had 640,000 tons of
conventional armaments.  Unfortunately, after the major battles were over,
these were not properly secured, and as of today, only about 150,000 tons
has been accounted for.  A lot of it is showing up in the black market.
who's to say that Saddam's chemical weapons didn't meet a similar fate.
The final report the U.S. put out on Iraq's WMD does not claim that he
didn't have them.  It only states that they were never found.