🚀 go-pugleaf

For those who do not know what the theory of Dipole Anti-Gravity is, see
the page 991 of the book "Gravitation" by Kip Thorne, C. Misner, J.
Wheeler or any other book with the same subject. Note that the
gravitational dipole moment is described as a disposable (removable) term
that doesn't have any physical meaning. To show the core of this problem
in detail, see the following.

For example, take a longitudually asymmetric yet axisymmetric shaped
rotor as a source rotating slowly at the frequency omega. Don't forget to
include the internal kinetic energy of the every mass components of the
rotor as a part of the total mass energy in the integrand for the
calculation of the dipole term and see what happens to the center of
gravity. See if this shift is removable. See also if you can make this
term disappear. If you don't know what all these means then you have no
chance of knowing anything about it at all. I admit this is too
elementary for  many professional physicsts enough to be annoyed at this
point. See what was the main cause of the negligence ?

The surprising presence of the non zero r^3 long ranged force multiplied
by cosine theta (same form as the electric dipole moment). There is much
more to it than this presentation. For an example, the presence of the
negative mass pole which automatically satisfies the exotic matter
hypothesis in the local level for the condition to create a wormhole.
This has already become too much pedagogic and elementary enough to annoy
most of the professional physicists to the degree of throwing the mouse.
After all, this forum has some educational purposes so I beg pardon from
most of the profesional physicists who in a millionth of a chance to be
in this forum and read this. I learned all these from Dr. Eue Jin Jeong
with fascination. Not only it makes sense, the implication is beyond
anyone's imagination. The presence of the controllable antigravity force
that can be extended to become a wormhole.... There has not been a theory
that gives this much explanation of the nature with virtually no
assumption. And the theory sticks closer to the original spirit of
general relativity than most of the presently known interpretation. Ok,
I've done it.. We need a Copernican change of view point to glympse the
beauty and vastness of the theory of Dipole Anti-Gravity.

Lary Adams:
> Einstein failed at a unified theory. Are you more
> capable than he?

This is an ad hominem agrument.  It is not necessary to be
more capable than someone to succeed where he failed.  This
is especially true when one is building on previous work.

-Robert Dick (dic...@wckn.dorm.clarkson.edu)-

In article <531fq3$k...@news3.realtime.net>, eje...@bga.com says...
>
>Not only it makes sense, the implication is beyond
>anyone's imagination.

Apparently it does not make sense. At least not to the referees who
reviewed Jeong's complete paper. Publication of it was turned down.
Educated people could not agree on the meaning of Jeong's idea.

The implication of any theory that promises unlimited energy and
instantaneous transport is obvious: utopia. Myself, I think that
technology is already moving way too fast. Faster than man's
ability to control it.

>Ok, I've done it..
>We need a Copernican change of view point to glympse the
>beauty and vastness of the theory of Dipole Anti-Gravity.

I hope you haven't "done it." Consider the fact that a wormhole
could swallow our entire planet and belch it out in some cold,
dark place. Einstein failed at a unified theory. Are you more
capable than he? Your reviewers didn't think so.