🚀 go-pugleaf

Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<zsTdc.4521$K_.136571@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> icycalmca@yahoo.com (Daryl Krupa) says  in
> news:c70365ef.0404092336.33a0afb8@posting.google.com:
>
> >>   The dating in the 28 kya range seems to coincide with a
> >> period of warmer temperatures, but that ice-free corridor
> >> was still closed.
> > <snip>
> >
> >   Sorry, it had not yet been closed, at 28 kya.
> >   And there are many indications that it was not closed,
> >   ever,
> > before somewhere around 21-24 ka BP.
>
> It seemed odd it would be closed during a warm period but
> open in colder periods. What do you think the basis was of the
> 30 kya date on closing?

See:
http://www.agiweb.org/geotimes/feb04/feature_Revisited.html

for a history of the controversy.  The article agrees with Art Dyke's evaluation.

Dar
>
> --
> Philip
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Mol. Anth. Group    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
> Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
> Evol. of Xchrom.
> http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
> Pal. Anth. Group    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
> Sci. Arch. Aux
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/