Article View: rec.sport.rugby.league
Article #3736Re: ARL postpones international thrash... er, clash
From: adam@sleeper.apa
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00
31 lines
1016 bytes
1016 bytes
engjs@cc.newcastle.edu.au (James Smith) wrote: >Leigh Gillespie writes: >> The Australian side as announced by Arko yesterday is/was... >> >> 9 - A Johns >Why the hell are they picking Andrew at hooker when he has a cracked >shoulder blade and can't play again this year? Is this an indication >that the ARL knew that the match wasn't going to take place, or am >I missing something? Is this true?? Is Johns really out for the season?? I heard he'd only be out for five weeks? Anyway, the ARL new that Johns would be out during the Test period but selected him as hooker because he was, for mine, the best player in the series. If the tests were to go ahead, Johns would be replaced by Walters, however, it would at least look like Walters was the second string player (which he certainly was in this year's series). If Walters was selected at hooker, it would appear, to the layman, that Walters was selected ahead of Johns, and this would make the selection committee look very inept. Cheers, Adam
Message-ID:
<4qanaa$g8d@sleeper.apana.org.au>
Path:
rocksolid-us.pugleaf.net!archive.newsdeef.eu!mbox2nntp-rec.sport.rugby.league.mbox.zip!not-for-mail
References:
<Pine.OSF.3.93.960619193133.25890A-100000@sailfish.jcu.edu.au> <1996Jun20.121754.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>