🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: rec.music.beatles
31 messages
31 total messages Started by Usurper Tom Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:10
Yoko's betrayal of John
#198895
Author: Usurper Tom
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:10
25 lines
1430 bytes
Yoko and John experimented and used drugs but John wasn't introduced
to heroin until he met her. Once adicted, they had wild parties in
which celebrities and record producers would come over and discuss
farting and excretia. The building superintendent at the Dakota once
confided to Jack Kirby, a local columnist and amateur Fartologist
that he had to unclog their toilet on several occasions.
Andy Warhol was present at one of their parties and reported seeing a
scaly residue floating in the clogged up toilet. Fish scales to be
precise. Fish heads were served as appetizers at said party.
John, a strict vegetarian, didn't partake of any appetizer that was
meat or a meat by product and perhaps this explains why his gas wasn't
so smelly.
Those parties would go on for hours because neither of them had to
work for a living. Yoko was living off of John's wealth (and still
is.) What would John's life have been like had he not married her? She
insisted they live in Jew York city. A fatal mistake for John.
I suppose it would have made little difference where he lived since
George, the ugly one, was attacked by a deranged satanist in his home
while living in England, home of tea sipping faggots and niggers who
talk with British accents.
Would George have liked to have had sex with Marge Helgenberger of CSI
fame? She is a strawberry blond and most men want to fuck strawberry
blondes.


Usurper Tom
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198906
Author: "loui"
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:28
70 bytes
you are a racist.!!!!!!          John Lennon hated your type of human.
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198910
Author: "UsurperTom"
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:25
4 lines
100 bytes
TAR wrote:

> Of course, this is a FORGERY.

Thanks!  I've never been forged before.  What an honor!
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198914
Author: "BL Bleanie"
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:05
10 lines
257 bytes
"UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1133796359.427630.323300@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> TAR wrote:
>
> > Of course, this is a FORGERY.
>
> Thanks!  I've never been forged before.  What an honor!

The honor fades quickly enough.
>
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198897
Author: TAR
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:29
29 lines
1528 bytes
Usurper Tom's Forger wrote:
>
> Yoko and John experimented and used drugs but John wasn't introduced
> to heroin until he met her. Once adicted, they had wild parties in
> which celebrities and record producers would come over and discuss
> farting and excretia. The building superintendent at the Dakota once
> confided to Jack Kirby, a local columnist and amateur Fartologist
> that he had to unclog their toilet on several occasions.
> Andy Warhol was present at one of their parties and reported seeing a
> scaly residue floating in the clogged up toilet. Fish scales to be
> precise. Fish heads were served as appetizers at said party.
> John, a strict vegetarian, didn't partake of any appetizer that was
> meat or a meat by product and perhaps this explains why his gas wasn't
> so smelly.
> Those parties would go on for hours because neither of them had to
> work for a living. Yoko was living off of John's wealth (and still
> is.) What would John's life have been like had he not married her? She
> insisted they live in Jew York city. A fatal mistake for John.
> I suppose it would have made little difference where he lived since
> George, the ugly one, was attacked by a deranged satanist in his home
> while living in England, home of tea sipping faggots and niggers who
> talk with British accents.
> Would George have liked to have had sex with Marge Helgenberger of CSI
> fame? She is a strawberry blond and most men want to fuck strawberry
> blondes.
>
> Usurper Tom's Forger


Of course, this is a FORGERY.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198965
Author: "^^^indifference
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:59
32 lines
1621 bytes
"Usurper Tom" <fritz@spamexpire-200512.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote
in message
news:b4547514c373eacbbb063d17748af09c@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> Yoko and John experimented and used drugs but John wasn't introduced
> to heroin until he met her. Once adicted, they had wild parties in
> which celebrities and record producers would come over and discuss
> farting and excretia. The building superintendent at the Dakota once
> confided to Jack Kirby, a local columnist and amateur Fartologist
> that he had to unclog their toilet on several occasions.
> Andy Warhol was present at one of their parties and reported seeing a
> scaly residue floating in the clogged up toilet. Fish scales to be
> precise. Fish heads were served as appetizers at said party.
> John, a strict vegetarian, didn't partake of any appetizer that was
> meat or a meat by product and perhaps this explains why his gas wasn't
> so smelly.
> Those parties would go on for hours because neither of them had to
> work for a living. Yoko was living off of John's wealth (and still
> is.) What would John's life have been like had he not married her? She
> insisted they live in Jew York city. A fatal mistake for John.
> I suppose it would have made little difference where he lived since
> George, the ugly one, was attacked by a deranged satanist in his home
> while living in England, home of tea sipping faggots and niggers who
> talk with British accents.
> Would George have liked to have had sex with Marge Helgenberger of CSI
> fame? She is a strawberry blond and most men want to fuck strawberry
> blondes.
>
>
> Usurper Tom
>

LOL.
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198966
Author: "^^^indifference
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:00
34 lines
1697 bytes
"TAR" <tom.rach@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:4394325B.50F@ix.netcom.com...
> Usurper Tom's Forger wrote:
> >
> > Yoko and John experimented and used drugs but John wasn't introduced
> > to heroin until he met her. Once adicted, they had wild parties in
> > which celebrities and record producers would come over and discuss
> > farting and excretia. The building superintendent at the Dakota once
> > confided to Jack Kirby, a local columnist and amateur Fartologist
> > that he had to unclog their toilet on several occasions.
> > Andy Warhol was present at one of their parties and reported seeing a
> > scaly residue floating in the clogged up toilet. Fish scales to be
> > precise. Fish heads were served as appetizers at said party.
> > John, a strict vegetarian, didn't partake of any appetizer that was
> > meat or a meat by product and perhaps this explains why his gas wasn't
> > so smelly.
> > Those parties would go on for hours because neither of them had to
> > work for a living. Yoko was living off of John's wealth (and still
> > is.) What would John's life have been like had he not married her? She
> > insisted they live in Jew York city. A fatal mistake for John.
> > I suppose it would have made little difference where he lived since
> > George, the ugly one, was attacked by a deranged satanist in his home
> > while living in England, home of tea sipping faggots and niggers who
> > talk with British accents.
> > Would George have liked to have had sex with Marge Helgenberger of CSI
> > fame? She is a strawberry blond and most men want to fuck strawberry
> > blondes.
> >
> > Usurper Tom's Forger
>
>
> Of course, this is a FORGERY.

Of course who gives a fuck.
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198971
Author: "^^^indifference
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:14
48 lines
1991 bytes
"TAR" <tom.rach@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:4394B8BF.5B70@ix.netcom.com...
> ^^^indifference^^ wrote:
> >
> > "TAR" <tom.rach@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> > news:4394325B.50F@ix.netcom.com...
> > > Usurper Tom's Forger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yoko and John experimented and used drugs but John wasn't introduced
> > > > to heroin until he met her. Once adicted, they had wild parties in
> > > > which celebrities and record producers would come over and discuss
> > > > farting and excretia. The building superintendent at the Dakota once
> > > > confided to Jack Kirby, a local columnist and amateur Fartologist
> > > > that he had to unclog their toilet on several occasions.
> > > > Andy Warhol was present at one of their parties and reported seeing
a
> > > > scaly residue floating in the clogged up toilet. Fish scales to be
> > > > precise. Fish heads were served as appetizers at said party.
> > > > John, a strict vegetarian, didn't partake of any appetizer that was
> > > > meat or a meat by product and perhaps this explains why his gas
wasn't
> > > > so smelly.
> > > > Those parties would go on for hours because neither of them had to
> > > > work for a living. Yoko was living off of John's wealth (and still
> > > > is.) What would John's life have been like had he not married her?
She
> > > > insisted they live in Jew York city. A fatal mistake for John.
> > > > I suppose it would have made little difference where he lived since
> > > > George, the ugly one, was attacked by a deranged satanist in his
home
> > > > while living in England, home of tea sipping faggots and niggers who
> > > > talk with British accents.
> > > > Would George have liked to have had sex with Marge Helgenberger of
CSI
> > > > fame? She is a strawberry blond and most men want to fuck strawberry
> > > > blondes.
> > > >
> > > > Usurper Tom's Forger
> > >
> > >
> > > Of course, this is a FORGERY.
> >
> > Of course who gives a fuck.
>
>
> Strawberry blondes?

Do they deny it?
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#198968
Author: TAR
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:02
38 lines
1814 bytes
^^^indifference^^ wrote:
>
> "TAR" <tom.rach@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:4394325B.50F@ix.netcom.com...
> > Usurper Tom's Forger wrote:
> > >
> > > Yoko and John experimented and used drugs but John wasn't introduced
> > > to heroin until he met her. Once adicted, they had wild parties in
> > > which celebrities and record producers would come over and discuss
> > > farting and excretia. The building superintendent at the Dakota once
> > > confided to Jack Kirby, a local columnist and amateur Fartologist
> > > that he had to unclog their toilet on several occasions.
> > > Andy Warhol was present at one of their parties and reported seeing a
> > > scaly residue floating in the clogged up toilet. Fish scales to be
> > > precise. Fish heads were served as appetizers at said party.
> > > John, a strict vegetarian, didn't partake of any appetizer that was
> > > meat or a meat by product and perhaps this explains why his gas wasn't
> > > so smelly.
> > > Those parties would go on for hours because neither of them had to
> > > work for a living. Yoko was living off of John's wealth (and still
> > > is.) What would John's life have been like had he not married her? She
> > > insisted they live in Jew York city. A fatal mistake for John.
> > > I suppose it would have made little difference where he lived since
> > > George, the ugly one, was attacked by a deranged satanist in his home
> > > while living in England, home of tea sipping faggots and niggers who
> > > talk with British accents.
> > > Would George have liked to have had sex with Marge Helgenberger of CSI
> > > fame? She is a strawberry blond and most men want to fuck strawberry
> > > blondes.
> > >
> > > Usurper Tom's Forger
> >
> >
> > Of course, this is a FORGERY.
>
> Of course who gives a fuck.


Strawberry blondes?
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199025
Author: "dlarsson"
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:20
3 lines
46 bytes
"Usurper Tom"

  What a troll ..............
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199077
Author: fattuchus@yahoo.
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:23
8 lines
406 bytes
Obviously a forge; however some of this fantasy rings true.

I don't recall the name of it, but I do recall a movie of JohnandYoko
together which includes a shot of John talking to Yoko thru the
bathroom doorway as he is sitting on the toilet.  Yes. You read right.
I am not kidding.  A film of Lennon on the potty talking to his
beloved.

So the toilet talk in the above forge is not too far off . . . . .
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199082
Author: TAR
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:09
13 lines
523 bytes
fattuchus@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Obviously a forge; however some of this fantasy rings true.
>
> I don't recall the name of it, but I do recall a movie of JohnandYoko
> together which includes a shot of John talking to Yoko thru the
> bathroom doorway as he is sitting on the toilet.  Yes. You read right.
> I am not kidding.  A film of Lennon on the potty talking to his
> beloved.
>
> So the toilet talk in the above forge is not too far off . . . . .


I thought you said that she always followed him into the bathroom.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199156
Author: fattuchus@yahoo.
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:58
8 lines
413 bytes
TAR wrote,

"I thought you said that she always follwed him into the bathroom."

I guess it depended on if it was a number one or number two and how
much it smelled.  In this movie John was not in a public toilet but
appeared to be in a private bathroom.  Yoko was a stone's throw from
the open doorway. I assume that since Yoko was so close and talking to
John as he was squeezing, he felt secure enough to poop.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199158
Author: "McFeeley"
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:05
16 lines
570 bytes
<fattuchus@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1133935136.628291.202600@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> TAR wrote,
>
> "I thought you said that she always follwed him into the bathroom."
>
> I guess it depended on if it was a number one or number two and how
> much it smelled.  In this movie John was not in a public toilet but
> appeared to be in a private bathroom.  Yoko was a stone's throw from
> the open doorway. I assume that since Yoko was so close and talking to
> John as he was squeezing, he felt secure enough to poop.

Are you married?

I'm betting no.
>
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199162
Author: fattuchus@yahoo.
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:10
4 lines
138 bytes
McFeeley,

     How much is your wager and where do you want to place your bet?

     How about it we start with, let's say, $10,000?   :)
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199196
Author: "McFeeley"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:00
12 lines
476 bytes
<fattuchus@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1133935811.629885.299240@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> McFeeley,
>
>     How much is your wager and where do you want to place your bet?
>
>     How about it we start with, let's say, $10,000?   :)

Then you are just a bizarre little person.  People share bathrooms when they
live together in such close quarters.  But then, your grasp of the obvious
is pretty lacking with everything else, why stop at the bathroom door?
>
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199211
Author: fattuchus@yahoo.
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:44
16 lines
783 bytes
McFeeley wrote,

"Then you are just a bizarre little person. People share bathrooms when
they live together in such close quarters.  But then your grasp of the
obvious is pretty lacking with everything else, why stop at the
bathroom door."

Gee, my bathroom talk must have hit a raw nerve with you.  This is the
second or third sarcastic remark from you directed at me in the past
couple of days.  I had hoped we had a peace treaty.

There's nothing wrong with sharing a bathroom depending on the
circumstances. However, I am not sure that John and Yoko the
millionaires lived in close quarters.  Putting this aside, when was the
last time you filmed yourself on the potty and distributed it for
public view like John did?  Maybe you can post a link here at rmb for
the world to see.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199219
Author: "McFeeley"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:52
33 lines
1276 bytes
<fattuchus@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1133973881.959708.251800@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> McFeeley wrote,
>
> "Then you are just a bizarre little person. People share bathrooms when
> they live together in such close quarters.  But then your grasp of the
> obvious is pretty lacking with everything else, why stop at the
> bathroom door."
>
> Gee, my bathroom talk must have hit a raw nerve with you.

What hits a nerve is how low you will go to criticize someone.  The
complaint is so bizarre and petty it begs comment.

This is the
> second or third sarcastic remark from you directed at me in the past
> couple of days.  I had hoped we had a peace treaty.

There is no peace treaty.  You post stupid things you get called on it, if
not by me then someone else.
>
> There's nothing wrong with sharing a bathroom depending on the
> circumstances. However, I am not sure that John and Yoko the
> millionaires lived in close quarters.  Putting this aside, when was the
> last time you filmed yourself on the potty and distributed it for
> public view like John did?  Maybe you can post a link here at rmb for
> the world to see.

Yeah, that would be sweet.

I agree filming it IS bizarre and had you simply left it at that I'd have
had nothing to disagree with.
>
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199228
Author: "UsurperTom"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:10
4 lines
126 bytes
McFeeley wrote:

> You post stupid things you get called on it, if not by me then someone else.

Other than Francie, who else?
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199240
Author: "McFeeley"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:53
11 lines
306 bytes
"UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1133979031.997349.183570@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> McFeeley wrote:
>
> > You post stupid things you get called on it, if not by me then someone
else.
>
> Other than Francie, who else?

I'm not keeping a list, Tom.  You can certainly do so.
>
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199244
Author: "bessiejunejoad"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:05
17 lines
518 bytes
McFeeley wrote:
> "UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1133979031.997349.183570@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > McFeeley wrote:
> >
> > > You post stupid things you get called on it, if not by me then someone
> else.
> >
> > Other than Francie, who else?
>
> I'm not keeping a list, Tom.  You can certainly do so.
> >

Anyone who disagrees that Yoko is evil incarnate and a spawn of the
devil is automatically assumed to be Francie by Tom.

Some people never got over the Beatles break up....
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199250
Author: "McFeeley"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:29
25 lines
789 bytes
"bessiejunejoad" <bessiejunejoad@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1133985926.289835.325460@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> McFeeley wrote:
>> "UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1133979031.997349.183570@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > McFeeley wrote:
>> >
>> > > You post stupid things you get called on it, if not by me then
>> > > someone
>> else.
>> >
>> > Other than Francie, who else?
>>
>> I'm not keeping a list, Tom.  You can certainly do so.
>> >
>
> Anyone who disagrees that Yoko is evil incarnate and a spawn of the
> devil is automatically assumed to be Francie by Tom.

Well, in Tom's defense, there are so many socks flying around here right now
it looks like a dryer convention.
>
> Some people never got over the Beatles break up....
>
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199251
Author: "UsurperTom"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:31
4 lines
188 bytes
bessiejunejoad wrote:

> Anyone who disagrees that Yoko is evil incarnate and a spawn of the devil is automatically assumed to be Francie by Tom.

Nice try, but Francie did attack fattush.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199253
Author: "McFeeley"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:32
11 lines
389 bytes
"UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1133987478.998876.321920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> bessiejunejoad wrote:
>
>> Anyone who disagrees that Yoko is evil incarnate and a spawn of the devil
>> is automatically assumed to be Francie by Tom.
>
> Nice try, but Francie did attack fattush.

Francie attacks everyone.  And fattass just goes around asking for it.
>
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199258
Author: "bessiejunejoad"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:43
14 lines
428 bytes
McFeeley wrote:
> "UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1133987478.998876.321920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > bessiejunejoad wrote:
> >
> >> Anyone who disagrees that Yoko is evil incarnate and a spawn of the devil
> >> is automatically assumed to be Francie by Tom.
> >
> > Nice try, but Francie did attack fattush.
>
> Francie attacks everyone.  And fattass just goes around asking for it.
> >

Yep
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199262
Author: "UsurperTom"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:06
4 lines
101 bytes
bessiejunejoad wrote:

> Yep

OK, bessie.  What does fattush do to deserve getting flamed by Francie?
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199265
Author: "bessiejunejoad"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:38
9 lines
226 bytes
UsurperTom wrote:
> bessiejunejoad wrote:
>
> > Yep
>
> OK, bessie.  What does fattush do to deserve getting flamed by Francie?

Posting NOTHING but nasty negative stuff about J&Y, being blinded by
hatred and narrowmindedness
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199266
Author: "UsurperTom"
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:41
4 lines
178 bytes
bessiejunejoad wrote:

> Posting NOTHING but nasty negative stuff about J&Y, being blinded by hatred and narrowmindedness

Yoko is a public figure and is fair game for criticism.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199264
Author: Ehtue
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:36
9 lines
139 bytes
UsurperTom wrote:

> bessiejunejoad wrote:
>
>> Yep
>
> OK, bessie.  What does fattush do to deserve getting flamed by Francie?


Exists.
Re: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199372
Author: fattuchus@yahoo.
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:08
7 lines
144 bytes
Usuper wrote,

"OK bessie. What does fattush do to deserve to getting flamed by
Francie?"

And Ehtue responded "Exists."

Yes . That sums it up.
Re: FORGERY: Yoko's betrayal of John
#199778
Author: "Captain Kundali
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:51
11 lines
360 bytes
Well. report the guy to his ISP. Shut him down.
The guy (notice I didn't say Man) is obviously a coward who doesn't know
about Karma.

"UsurperTom" <UsurperTom@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1133796359.427630.323300@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> TAR wrote:
>
>> Of course, this is a FORGERY.
>
> Thanks!  I've never been forged before.  What an honor!
>
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads