Thread View: rec.arts.movies.current-films
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by missguydid@hotma
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:41
ebert and moore hypocrisy
Author: missguydid@hotma
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:41
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:41
99 lines
4571 bytes
4571 bytes
http://articles.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1295/is_8_67/ai_106225217 Q: What do you make of the criticism of Hollywood celebrities for speaking out against the war--the Sean Penns, the Susan Sarandons? Ebert: It's just ignorant; it's just ignorant. Q: Why do you say that? Ebert: I begin to feel like I was in the last generation of Americans who took a civics class. I begin to feel like most Americans don't understand the First Amendment, don't understand the idea of freedom of speech, and don't understand that it's the responsibility of the citizen to speak out. If Hollywood stars speak out, so do all sorts of other people. Now Hollywood stars can get a better hearing. Oddly enough, the people who mostly seem to hear them are those on the right wing, so Fox News can put on its ticker tape in Times Square a vile attack on Michael Moore, and Susan Sarandon is a punchline. The right wants to shut other people up. Q: Why do you think a lot of people vote Republican when it's not in their interest to do so? Ebert: I think most people are more susceptible to prejudice than to reason. And the parrots of talk radio are just sending out the same stuff. When I look at my e-mails, I see the same Limbaugh rhetoric; apparently, people don't have any ideas of their own. And there's just this drum roll of anti-progressive thought. Essentially, the country is in the grip of some very bad information. I think a lot of working class people don't understand that their money is being stolen. I saw an interesting article that said 10 percent of the American public would put themselves in the top 1 percent in income. Q: This is why Americans favor the repeal of the estate tax. Ebert: Yeah, they all think they're going to leave a big estate, and they love Bush's theories because they all think they're going to get rich someday. But the fact is, most people are not going to be rich someday. And we've had a concerted policy of taking money away from the poor and giving it to the rich wholesale, and at the same time, we have the runaway corporations and the greed. I feel ordinary people really should be angry. ------------- the right wants to shut up whom? who's pushing for pc censorship, right or left? why doesn't ebert raise a fuss about bardot getting fined for writing a book? did jimmy the greek get fired by rightists for his statement about black athletes? or that baseball player by his remark about NY? or marge schott? who made 'hate speech' a crime? left or right? not that hate speech is a good thing, but who's trying to curb freedom of speech these days, right or left? it's almost always the left. to my knowledge limbaugh even defended howard stern's free speech rights despite their mutual hostility. funny aint it, that nat hentoff the liberal is angrier with the left on free speech issues these days than with the right? also, if ebert--and moore--are so angry at the rich getting richer and taking poor people's money, why don't they ever speak out against hollywood which is one of the most corrupt, greedy, tribal, exclusive enterprises in america and the world? does hollywood get a free pass from ebert simply because (1) he needs access to hollywood stars (2) hollywood is liberal? i guess if one's liberal, it's okay to be wantonly acquisitive, crass, greedy, corrupt, and self-righteous. heck, how much are people like sean penn worth anyway? if he's such a man of the people, why did he star in shitty movies just to rake in big bucks and ride around in limos and live in a giant mansion with a mega swimming pool? isn't making movies like this stealing from the poor by feeding them false fantasies? indeed, what do working class folks or poor people gain by plonking down hardearned cash to watch shit like LOR anyway, making themselves poorer while the hollywood rich get richer? worse, isn't hollywood stealing from the poor all around the globe by selling crass fantasies of american life? yet, where is ebert's fury against avarice, greed, corruption of values? but, ebert goes easy on hollywood. when the great godard trashed hollywood assholes in his most recent movie, ebert closed ranks with hollywood and blasted godard. also, if ebert has problem with bush invoking god, where was the outrage when clinton squeaked out of the lewinsky scandal by... invoking god? boy, wasn't that a jimmy swaggert moment. ebert insists bush is not a legit president but is he a legit critic? and how honest is he? how do you call both fahrenheit 9-11 and passion of christ massuhpieces?
Re: ebert and moore hypocrisy
Author: "tim gueguen"
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:57
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:57
8 lines
204 bytes
204 bytes
"miss guydid" <missguydid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:e18a7727.0406130041.674fa659@posting.google.com... More trolling, or at the very least an indication of his ignorance. tim gueguen 101867
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads