Thread View: rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe
11 messages
11 total messages
Started by "Bort"
Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:55
Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: "Bort"
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:55
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:55
31 lines
1345 bytes
1345 bytes
From: http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stories/0509/05/index.htm Zak Penn, who wrote X3 with Simon Kinberg, has been on the set in Vancouver, British Columbia. During a recent convention appearance, he said that his job is be "keeper of the flame" of the X-Men mythology, which includes many challenges. "In addition to just figuring out how the hell am I going take, like for example in X-Men 2, these 17 characters and give them screen time that¹s appropriate," Penn said, "the other thing is you¹re generally also trying to fight all the battles on, 'OK, this is what I see as being the heart of the material, and how am I going to keep all these different people happy?' "People like Kevin (Feige) are an excellent ally at Marvel because he is the only other person in the room who's truly focused on here is what the source material is about and here is why we're making an X-Men movie. It's not just because Hugh Jackman's a big star; it's because people love the story of the X-Men on a fundamental level. "And with almost of all of these Marvel properties, that¹s what it¹s about." I know Rattner is going to have the last say on a lot of stuff, but the fact that they're allowing the screen-writer to be so involved, and the fact that he seems to care so much about what actually happens...are we in good hands after all?
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: "M.O.R"
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:23
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:23
7 lines
410 bytes
410 bytes
Except when you look at his CV, there are not alot of good films on it. For example, Inspector Gadget, Last Action Hero, Elektra, and Behind Enemy Lines. Sometimes the enthusiasm that a writer may have for a project doesn't translate into a great film. And considering how much control Ratner is gonna have, (I'm surprised Jessica Simpson wasn't asked to audition or given a part), the signs seem ominous.
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: "Jinx"
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:48
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:48
3 lines
77 bytes
77 bytes
Would have been bolstered by the presence of Tom Desanto on this one but...
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: "Bort"
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:50
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:50
12 lines
532 bytes
532 bytes
M.O.R wrote: > Except when you look at his CV, there are not alot of good films on it. > For example, Inspector Gadget, Last Action Hero, Elektra, and Behind > Enemy Lines. Sometimes the enthusiasm that a writer may have for a > project doesn't translate into a great film. And considering how much > control Ratner is gonna have, (I'm surprised Jessica Simpson wasn't > asked to audition or given a part), the signs seem ominous. Yes, but if you look at the fact that Penn co-wrote X-Men 1 and 2, doesn't that give you hope?
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: Lynley James
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:30
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:30
14 lines
702 bytes
702 bytes
On 5 Sep 2005 19:23:28 -0700, "M.O.R" <predator@esatclear.ie> wrote: >Except when you look at his CV, there are not alot of good films on it. > For example, Inspector Gadget, Last Action Hero, Elektra, and Behind >Enemy Lines. Sometimes the enthusiasm that a writer may have for a >project doesn't translate into a great film. And considering how much >control Ratner is gonna have, (I'm surprised Jessica Simpson wasn't >asked to audition or given a part), the signs seem ominous. Last Action Hero was actually a very good film. it was surprising and refreshing to see Arnie poke fun at himself and the genre that made him famous while he was still the world's most popular action actor. Lynley
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: badthingus@yahoo
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:26
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:26
5 lines
285 bytes
285 bytes
I'd love to give you hope, but thinking that the writer alone can save things is like saying that every production of a Shakespearean is good because it's Shakespeare. They aren't. And if bad directors can ruin Shakespeare, imagine what someone like Rattner can do an X-men script.
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: "Bort"
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:31
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:31
11 lines
526 bytes
526 bytes
badthingus@yahoo.com wrote: > I'd love to give you hope, but thinking that the writer alone can save > things is like saying that every production of a Shakespearean is good > because it's Shakespeare. They aren't. And if bad directors can ruin > Shakespeare, imagine what someone like Rattner can do an X-men script. Except that Shakespeare isn't present at the contemporary production like this writer is. He's right there in the thick of things, and he said his job is to keep the X-Men mythos present in the movies.
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: badthingus@yahoo
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:59
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:59
3 lines
109 bytes
109 bytes
Writers have no power. Unless he's a writer/producer, he's got about as much power over X3 as Shakespeare.
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: "Bort"
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:03
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:03
13 lines
466 bytes
466 bytes
badthingus@yahoo.com wrote: > Writers have no power. Unless he's a writer/producer, he's got about > as much power over X3 as Shakespeare. So when he says, "During a recent convention appearance, he said that his job is be "keeper of the flame" of the X-Men mythology"...you're saying the people in charge lied to him and told him he had that job while the movie was being made, while in reality no one listens to anything he says? I find that hard to believe.
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: badthingus@yahoo
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:51
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:51
15 lines
885 bytes
885 bytes
You're surprised to find liars in hollywood? You're kidding, right? Welcome to show business. As Howard Hawks once said to a writer, "It doesn't matter what you write. We're just going to change it anyway." He changed the ending of Red River and the writer never spoke to him again. Writers have no *real* power. Listening to them is merely a courtesy. No one is obligated to do so and few rarely do. If the writer says the costume is red and the director or producer or even the actor prefers blue, the costume is going to be blue. He can *believe* anything he wants about his position, but the reality is Ratner or Halle Berry could have him banned from the set tomorrow. Let me put it this way: Joss Whedon wrote the original Buffy The Vampire Slayer movie, but was *only* the writer. He was the writer, producer and director of the series. Can you tell the difference?
Re: Maybe X-Men 3 *won't* be ruined by Rattner...
Author: badthingus@yahoo
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:54
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:54
4 lines
159 bytes
159 bytes
...and as someone else pointed out, Zak Penn is a bit of a hack anyway, so it's not like he's Robert Towne or anything and his *golden touch* will be missed.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads