Thread View: rec.antiques.radio+phono
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by jsw@physics.att.
Mon, 28 Nov 1994 16:53
Drake T4XB+ HQ170AC-VHF. Keep or Dump?
Author: jsw@physics.att.
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 16:53
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 16:53
21 lines
772 bytes
772 bytes
I am getting back on the air after many years. I have a Drake T4XB transmitter and Hammarlund HQ170AC-VHF receiver that I had bought in the sixties. It is clear to me that the Hammarlund has got to go. The question is: 1. Is it worth getting a used Drake R4B receiver from somewhere or is equipment so much better these days that it is not worth bothering? 2. What is the going rate to buy an R4B and where would I get one? 3. What would the going rates be to sell the T4XB or HQ170 and where would I sell them? Are they collectors' items? 4. How have xmtrs & rcvrs improved in the last 25 years? Sensitivity, selectivity, stability, features, programmability? Note: I started when I was 9 yrs old so I am not as old as this msg makes me seem. Thanks, Joe
Re: Drake T4XB+ HQ170AC-VHF. Keep or Dump?
Author: vancleef@bga.com
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 06:14
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 06:14
58 lines
2623 bytes
2623 bytes
This really doesn't belong in rec.antiques.radio+phono. I see it was crossposted to some of the more appropriate newsgroups, and I am leaving the crosspostings in this response, because my response to the questions will give some idea what rec.antiques.radio+phono is about. I have set followups to rec.radio.amateur.equipment. In article <CzzLKJ.AsI@nntpa.cb.att.com>, Joseph Weiner <jsw@physics.att.com> wrote: >I am getting back on the air after many years. I have a >Drake T4XB transmitter and Hammarlund HQ170AC-VHF receiver >that I had bought in the sixties. It is clear to me that >the Hammarlund has got to go. The question is: Our group's focus is on home entertainment items---acoustic phonos and old radios, primarily from the 1920-50 period. While there is some discussion of tube-type "boatanchor" communications radios, it is generally of older general-coverage sets. The mail list boatanchors@gnu.ai.mit.edu is a good place to get information on things like HQ-170's and old transmitters. > >1. Is it worth getting a used Drake R4B receiver from somewhere > or is equipment so much better these days that it is not >worth bothering? Most of us would rather have a Philco chairside, an old Atwater Kent, or a Hallicraftrs SX-17. I've got a postwar Magnavox, an HQ-150, and an RME-45, all working fine, and wouldn't trade any of them for a Drake. Can't get the French and Canadian (french) shortwave stations with a Drake. >2. What is the going rate to buy an R4B and where would > I get one? Not very likely here. A Drake is a ham receiver, not home entertainment. >3. What would the going rates be to sell the T4XB or HQ170 > and where would I sell them? Are they collectors' items? Once again, this is not an amateur radio newsgroup. >4. How have xmtrs & rcvrs improved in the last 25 years? > Sensitivity, selectivity, stability, features, programmability? Define "improved." A lot of our readers think that a Victor Orthophonic is superior to an electric phonograph. > These questions are about getting active in ham radio, and there are newsgroups that are directed toward that purpose, which this item was posted to. It shouldn't have been crossposted here. This is an antiques group, created to take discussion of home entertainment stuff out of rec.antiques. There are several amateur radio groups, and we don't attempt to fill any gaps in them in this group---if, indeed, there are any. -- *********************************************************** Hank van Cleef vancleef@bga.com vancleef@tmn.com ***********************************************************
Re: Drake T4XB+ HQ170AC-VHF. Keep or Dump?
Author: mack@ncifcrf.gov
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 16:18
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 16:18
34 lines
1191 bytes
1191 bytes
In article <CzzLKJ.AsI@nntpa.cb.att.com> jsw@physics.att.com (Joseph Weiner) writes: >I am getting back on the air after many years. I have a >Drake T4XB transmitter and Hammarlund HQ170AC-VHF receiver >that I had bought in the sixties. It is clear to me that >the Hammarlund has got to go. The question is: > >1. Is it worth getting a used Drake R4B receiver from somewhere > or is equipment so much better these days that it is not >worth bothering? >2. What is the going rate to buy an R4B and where would > I get one? 2~ Try the Smithsonian |-) 2~ Just kidding welcome back. About 15 years ago everything changed to synthesised rigs. You can get a used one for quite cheap from 10yrs ago that does 90% of what a new one does (IMHO). I was out of it for 20yrs too. Things changed a lot in the 70;s. Joe NA3T mack@ncifcrf.gov >3. What would the going rates be to sell the T4XB or HQ170 > and where would I sell them? Are they collectors' items? >4. How have xmtrs & rcvrs improved in the last 25 years? > Sensitivity, selectivity, stability, features, programmability? > >Note: I started when I was 9 yrs old so I am not as old as >this msg makes me seem. > >Thanks, >Joe
Re: Drake T4XB+ HQ170AC-VHF. Keep or Dump?
Author: Joe@interramp.co
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:40
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:40
57 lines
2820 bytes
2820 bytes
In article <CzzLKJ.AsI@nntpa.cb.att.com>, <jsw@physics.att.com> writes: > Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.antiques. radio+phono,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew > Path: interramp.com!psinntp!scisun!ees1a0.engr.ccny.cuny.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att. com!nntpa!not-for-mail > From: jsw@physics.att.com (Joseph Weiner) > Subject: Drake T4XB+ HQ170AC-VHF. Keep or Dump? > Message-ID: <CzzLKJ.AsI@nntpa.cb.att.com> > Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration) > Nntp-Posting-Host: physics.div111.att.com > Organization: AT&T > X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 16:53:06 GMT > Lines: 20 > Xref: interramp.com rec.radio.amateur.misc:10931 rec.radio.swap:5522 rec.radio.amateur.equipment:4230 rec.antiques.radio+phono:1990 rec.radio.shortwave:9209 rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:2306 > > I am getting back on the air after many years. I have a > Drake T4XB transmitter and Hammarlund HQ170AC-VHF receiver > that I had bought in the sixties. It is clear to me that > the Hammarlund has got to go. The question is: > > 1. Is it worth getting a used Drake R4B receiver from somewhere > or is equipment so much better these days that it is not > worth bothering? > 2. What is the going rate to buy an R4B and where would > I get one? > 3. What would the going rates be to sell the T4XB or HQ170 > and where would I sell them? Are they collectors' items? > 4. How have xmtrs & rcvrs improved in the last 25 years? > Sensitivity, selectivity, stability, features, programmability? > > Note: I started when I was 9 yrs old so I am not as old as > this msg makes me seem. > > Thanks, > Joe JOE: You probably want a serious reply to your question, not just a lot of FLABS (Folklore and B___ S___). But, it's the end of a long week and I've been adjustingmy attitude with 12-year-old single malt Scotch, so here goes. Do not dump those two old classics. I was licensed in 1958 and will be 50 years old next week. I drive a 72 VW Beetle, write with a Parker 51 fountain pen given to me by my grandfather when I entered high school, and cut my grass with a push mower. Keep the old stuff. Clean it up. Get some tuner cleaner at RAdio Shack and blast all the variable capacitors and potentiometers'; that will clean out a lot of the problems. Replace the fileter capacitors. Make a list of the tube types and whenvever you encounter tubes for sale, buy some. Of course, you probably ought ot go ahead and buy yourself a recent model rice box from ICOM (I use the IC-129; the IC-735 is a classic), Kenwood, or Yaesu and get on the air. But, keep the old stuff. Make yur ice cream in a hand-cranked freezer. Drink our beer from the bottle. Be eccentric. You only live once and it's your life.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads