Thread View: nyc.politics
12 messages
12 total messages
Started by "torresD"
Sat, 22 May 2004 19:44
Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "torresD"
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:44
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:44
4 lines
48 bytes
48 bytes
Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: Michelle Steiner
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:16
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:16
11 lines
215 bytes
215 bytes
In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote: > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? No. -- Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Vote for John Kerry.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "Hauptsurmfuhrer
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16
23 lines
970 bytes
970 bytes
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net... > In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, > "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? > > No. > Well, now that Clinton is out of office, your body won't be found at a air plane crash site or from "self inflicted" bullet wounds. Interns don't have to suck dick, aides don't get raped, China has to do their own weapons research, janitors in aspirin factories can go back to work, Chinese arms dealers are no longer given carte blanche at the White House, people who sell Bill cocaine don't turn up dead, aides and friends of Bill have less chance of getting indicted or doing time in the Federal Pen. We don't have any more rag head terrorists taking flying lessons in Phoenix or Scottsdale, etc, etc, I hate to bore everyone with stuff they already know, but you asked.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: Michelle Steiner
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 15:47
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 15:47
10 lines
232 bytes
232 bytes
In article <1rPrc.10487$7y5.1159@fed1read03>, "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: The usual litany of bullshit right wing lies. You are an enemy of America, Nazi boy. -- Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Vote for John Kerry.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "Hauptsturmfuhre
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:00
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:00
14 lines
453 bytes
453 bytes
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:michelle-1EF761.15473222052004@news.west.cox.net... > In article <1rPrc.10487$7y5.1159@fed1read03>, > "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: > > The usual litany of bullshit right wing lies. You are an enemy of > America, Nazi boy. > Nein, Nein, Nein. I am an enemy of the leftist, liberal Democrats and those who betray our country and President to the enemy. People like you.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "Clave"
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:07
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:07
20 lines
606 bytes
606 bytes
"Hauptsturmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote in message news:I5Xrc.11940$7y5.10763@fed1read03... > > "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message > news:michelle-1EF761.15473222052004@news.west.cox.net... > > In article <1rPrc.10487$7y5.1159@fed1read03>, > > "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: > > > > The usual litany of bullshit right wing lies. You are an enemy of > > America, Nazi boy. > > > Nein, Nein, Nein. I am an enemy of the leftist, liberal Democrats and those > who betray our country and President to the enemy. People like you. Bernie's a Democrat, you know. Jim
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: Fair and Balance
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:26
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:26
19 lines
481 bytes
481 bytes
On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: > >"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net... >> In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, >> "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? >> >> No. >> >Well, now ........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an honorable discharge
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: " \"Treator\"the
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 00:49
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 00:49
32 lines
1002 bytes
1002 bytes
Ever wonder why the arab communities are not outraged by the 9/11 attacks ? >On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer" ><JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: > >> >>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net... >>> In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, >>> "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? >>> >>> No. >>> >>Well, now > >........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an >honorable discharge That makes as much sense as a pickle with warts ! The fact is we are much safer. But of course the left will attack anything that moves, as long as it does not bite ! There done as a major party ! The party self destructed with the clinton regime era.So with that said. "Welcome in the libertarian party" . Stick a fork in it , the liberals are done ! "We "will" drive the country into the ground, So help us.... who ?
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: grandwazoo
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 04:45
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 04:45
52 lines
1821 bytes
1821 bytes
"Treator"the liberal wrote: > Ever wonder why the arab communities are not outraged by the 9/11 > attacks ? > >>On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer" >><JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: >> >> >>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message >>>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net... >>> >>>>In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, >>>> "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? >>>> >>>>No. >>>> >>> >>>Well, now >> >>........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an >>honorable discharge > > That makes as much sense as a pickle with warts ! > > The fact is we are much safer. But of course the left will attack > anything that moves, as long as it does not bite ! There done as a > major party ! The party self destructed with the clinton regime era.So > with that said. "Welcome in the libertarian party" . > > Stick a fork in it , the liberals are done ! > > > "We "will" drive the country into the ground, > So help us.... who ? Are we safer? Homeland security, patriot act make us less vulnerable to terrorist attack. War in Afghanistan, War in Iraq have increased the number of terrorist minded people. Terrorist attack Americans, Afghanistani and Iraqis almost every day. If we includes US Forces, then homeland security is holding up, but Americans are not safer than before 9/11. Bad decisions, executed badly have consequences to Americans. Next, the rate of American casualties is increasing. This seems to balance the scale in favor of less safe. We need to correct the decisions, and have the correct decisions executed well. Therefore, the highest level of leadership responsible for bad decisions and bad execution need to be fired.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "torresD"
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 06:02
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 06:02
14 lines
262 bytes
262 bytes
"Hauptsturmfuhrer" > Nein, Nein, Nein. I am an enemy of the leftist, liberal Democrats and those > who betray our country and President to the enemy. People like you. The Unelected One betrayed the nation, when he invaded Iraq, based on a tissue of lies.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "Hauptsturmfuhre
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:33
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:33
64 lines
2458 bytes
2458 bytes
"grandwazoo" <grand@nospam.com> wrote in message news:1085312498.580656@news.commspeed.net... > "Treator"the liberal wrote: > > > Ever wonder why the arab communities are not outraged by the 9/11 > > attacks ? > > > >>On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer" > >><JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message > >>>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net... > >>> > >>>>In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, > >>>> "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? > >>>> > >>>>No. > >>>> > >>> > >>>Well, now > >> > >>........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an > >>honorable discharge > > > > That makes as much sense as a pickle with warts ! > > > > The fact is we are much safer. But of course the left will attack > > anything that moves, as long as it does not bite ! There done as a > > major party ! The party self destructed with the clinton regime era.So > > with that said. "Welcome in the libertarian party" . > > > > Stick a fork in it , the liberals are done ! > > > > > > "We "will" drive the country into the ground, > > So help us.... who ? > > Are we safer? Homeland security, patriot act make us less vulnerable to > terrorist attack. War in Afghanistan, War in Iraq have increased the > number of terrorist minded people. Terrorist attack Americans, > Afghanistani and Iraqis almost every day. If we includes US Forces, then > homeland security is holding up, but Americans are not safer than > before 9/11. Bad decisions, executed badly have consequences to > Americans. Next, the rate of American casualties is increasing. This > seems to balance the scale in favor of less safe. We need to correct the > decisions, and have the correct decisions executed well. Therefore, the > highest level of leadership responsible for bad decisions and bad > execution need to be fired. > Of course you are safer than after 9/11, except for traffic accidents. When was the last terrorist act in your hometown? What are you going to do to correct the decisions, surrender to someone? How about give the US to the United Nations? We are the United Nations. they don't have equipment, or money without us. If you were firing government executives, you should have lobbied your Senators to help impeach Bill Clinton, and there may not have been a 9/11.
Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
Author: "Michael J. Ryan
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:59
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:59
12 lines
462 bytes
462 bytes
torresD wrote: > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago? No, because the borders are still open enough for 10,000 illegal migrants a day to walk accross the border... I am not critisizing the migrants, just the fact that for 10,000 every night, on average, that is a pretty big, god damned hole. -- Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net icq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads