🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

12 total messages Started by "torresD" Sat, 22 May 2004 19:44
Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99863
Author: "torresD"
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:44
4 lines
48 bytes
Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?



Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99866
Author: Michelle Steiner
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:16
11 lines
215 bytes
In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
 "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?

No.

--
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease:  Vote for John Kerry.


Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99875
Author: "Hauptsurmfuhrer
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16
23 lines
970 bytes
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net...
> In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>  "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?
>
> No.
>
Well,  now that Clinton is out of office, your body won't be found at a air
plane crash site or from "self inflicted" bullet wounds. Interns don't have
to suck dick, aides don't get raped, China has to do their own weapons
research, janitors  in aspirin factories can go back to work, Chinese arms
dealers are no longer given carte blanche at the White House, people who
sell Bill cocaine don't turn up dead, aides and friends of Bill have less
chance of getting indicted or doing time in the Federal Pen. We don't have
any more rag head terrorists taking flying lessons in Phoenix or Scottsdale,
etc, etc, I hate to bore everyone with stuff they already know, but you
asked.



Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99884
Author: Michelle Steiner
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 15:47
10 lines
232 bytes
In article <1rPrc.10487$7y5.1159@fed1read03>,
 "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:

The usual litany of bullshit right wing lies.  You are an enemy of
America, Nazi boy.

--
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease:  Vote for John Kerry.


Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99909
Author: "Hauptsturmfuhre
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:00
14 lines
453 bytes
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
news:michelle-1EF761.15473222052004@news.west.cox.net...
> In article <1rPrc.10487$7y5.1159@fed1read03>,
>  "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:
>
> The usual litany of bullshit right wing lies.  You are an enemy of
> America, Nazi boy.
>
Nein, Nein, Nein. I am an enemy of the leftist, liberal Democrats and those
who betray our country and President to the enemy. People like you.



Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99913
Author: "Clave"
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:07
20 lines
606 bytes
"Hauptsturmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote in message
news:I5Xrc.11940$7y5.10763@fed1read03...
>
> "Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> news:michelle-1EF761.15473222052004@news.west.cox.net...
> > In article <1rPrc.10487$7y5.1159@fed1read03>,
> >  "Hauptsurmfuhrer" <JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:
> >
> > The usual litany of bullshit right wing lies.  You are an enemy of
> > America, Nazi boy.
> >
> Nein, Nein, Nein. I am an enemy of the leftist, liberal Democrats and those
> who betray our country and President to the enemy. People like you.

Bernie's a Democrat, you know.

Jim



Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99888
Author: Fair and Balance
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:26
19 lines
481 bytes
On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer"
<JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:

>
>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net...
>> In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>>  "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?
>>
>> No.
>>
>Well,  now

........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an
honorable discharge


Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99897
Author: " \"Treator\"the
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 00:49
32 lines
1002 bytes
Ever wonder why the arab communities are not outraged by the 9/11
attacks ?
>On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer"
><JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
>>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net...
>>> In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>>>  "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>Well,  now
>
>........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an
>honorable discharge
That makes as much sense as a pickle with warts !

 The fact is we are much  safer. But of course the left will attack
anything that moves, as long as it does not bite ! There done as a
major party ! The party self destructed with the clinton regime era.So
with that said. "Welcome in  the libertarian party" .

Stick a fork in it , the liberals are done !


"We "will" drive the country into the ground,
 So help us.... who ?

Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99943
Author: grandwazoo
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 04:45
52 lines
1821 bytes
   "Treator"the liberal wrote:

> Ever wonder why the arab communities are not outraged by the 9/11
> attacks ?
>
>>On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer"
>><JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
>>>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net...
>>>
>>>>In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>>>> "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?
>>>>
>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Well,  now
>>
>>........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an
>>honorable discharge
>
> That makes as much sense as a pickle with warts !
>
>  The fact is we are much  safer. But of course the left will attack
> anything that moves, as long as it does not bite ! There done as a
> major party ! The party self destructed with the clinton regime era.So
> with that said. "Welcome in  the libertarian party" .
>
> Stick a fork in it , the liberals are done !
>
>
> "We "will" drive the country into the ground,
>  So help us.... who ?

Are we safer? Homeland security, patriot act make us less vulnerable to
terrorist attack. War in Afghanistan, War in Iraq have increased the
number of terrorist minded people. Terrorist attack Americans,
Afghanistani and Iraqis almost every day. If we includes US Forces, then
  homeland security is holding up, but Americans are not safer than
before 9/11. Bad decisions, executed badly have consequences to
Americans. Next, the rate of American casualties is increasing. This
seems to balance the scale in favor of less safe. We need to correct the
decisions, and have the correct decisions executed well. Therefore, the
highest level of leadership responsible for bad decisions and bad
execution need to be fired.


Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99910
Author: "torresD"
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 06:02
14 lines
262 bytes
"Hauptsturmfuhrer"
> Nein, Nein, Nein. I am an enemy of the leftist, liberal Democrats and
those
> who betray our country and President to the enemy. People like you.


The Unelected One betrayed the nation,
when he invaded Iraq, based on a tissue
of lies.




Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99947
Author: "Hauptsturmfuhre
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:33
64 lines
2458 bytes
"grandwazoo" <grand@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:1085312498.580656@news.commspeed.net...
>    "Treator"the liberal wrote:
>
> > Ever wonder why the arab communities are not outraged by the 9/11
> > attacks ?
> >
> >>On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:16:54 -0700, "Hauptsurmfuhrer"
> >><JaJaJa@Heil.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message
> >>>news:michelle-49FC23.13163522052004@news.west.cox.net...
> >>>
> >>>>In article <a4Orc.5455$Tn6.901@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> >>>> "torresD" <torresD30@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?
> >>>>
> >>>>No.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Well,  now
> >>
> >>........Air National Guardsman have to actually serve to get an
> >>honorable discharge
> >
> > That makes as much sense as a pickle with warts !
> >
> >  The fact is we are much  safer. But of course the left will attack
> > anything that moves, as long as it does not bite ! There done as a
> > major party ! The party self destructed with the clinton regime era.So
> > with that said. "Welcome in  the libertarian party" .
> >
> > Stick a fork in it , the liberals are done !
> >
> >
> > "We "will" drive the country into the ground,
> >  So help us.... who ?
>
> Are we safer? Homeland security, patriot act make us less vulnerable to
> terrorist attack. War in Afghanistan, War in Iraq have increased the
> number of terrorist minded people. Terrorist attack Americans,
> Afghanistani and Iraqis almost every day. If we includes US Forces, then
>   homeland security is holding up, but Americans are not safer than
> before 9/11. Bad decisions, executed badly have consequences to
> Americans. Next, the rate of American casualties is increasing. This
> seems to balance the scale in favor of less safe. We need to correct the
> decisions, and have the correct decisions executed well. Therefore, the
> highest level of leadership responsible for bad decisions and bad
> execution need to be fired.
>
Of course you are safer than after 9/11, except for traffic accidents. When
was the last terrorist act in your hometown? What are you going to do to
correct the decisions, surrender to someone? How about give the US to the
United Nations? We are the United Nations. they don't have equipment, or
money without us. If you were firing government executives, you should have
lobbied your Senators to help impeach Bill Clinton, and there may not have
been a 9/11.



Re: Are We Safer Under Bush or Clinton?
#99937
Author: "Michael J. Ryan
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:59
12 lines
462 bytes
torresD wrote:
> Are you safer now than you were 4 years ago?

No, because the borders are still open enough for 10,000 illegal migrants
a day to walk accross the border...  I am not critisizing the migrants,
just the fact that for 10,000 every night, on average, that is a pretty
big, god damned hole.

--
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net
icq: 4935386  -  AIM/AOL: azTracker1  -  Y!: azTracker1  -  MSN/Win: (email)

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads