🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 6 Feb 1996 19:13:38 GMT fsimonds@emi.net wrote:

|> Before I stand in line for my copy of the 1.5.4 Beta, will it really be
|> worth it? Eudora Light seems to hum along at a respectable clip here
|> inside the byte box...

|> Anyone out there noticed any miraculous improvement in your mail-handling
|> ability when you upgraded from Light to Beta? Did it improve your
|> well-being (whatever that is!)? Are you a happier camper? Were you a
|> happy camper?

|> Terry

Terry

IMHO it is worth the download.  I like the feature where the new
version recognizes URL links from within email messages and the
ability to activate them from emails.

Regarding the "miraculous improvements " and "improved well-being",
well I would recommend a camping trip without the byte box :-))

Dan

--
Daniel M Murray
dmm@stp.co.za

In article <DMDC2r.nFx@emi.net>, fsimonds@emi.net says:
>
>Before I stand in line for my copy of the 1.5.4 Beta, will it really be
>worth it? Eudora Light seems to hum along at a respectable clip here
>inside the byte box...
>
>Anyone out there noticed any miraculous improvement in your mail-handling
>ability when you upgraded from Light to Beta? Did it improve your
>well-being (whatever that is!)? Are you a happier camper? Were you a
>happy camper?
>
>Terry
>
See my posting of article 4903.  I could not connect to my mail server
when I switched to the new beta version and kept the settings the same
in my .ini file.  I reinstalled ver. 1.5.2 and everything was fine again.
If you find out what the difference is between the two versions that
caused this problem and what settings must be changed, please let me
know.
Thanks!

Rodney
dukerk@conrad.appstate.edu

fsimonds@emi.net wrote:

>Before I stand in line for my copy of the 1.5.4 Beta, will it really be
>worth it? Eudora Light seems to hum along at a respectable clip here
>inside the byte box...

>Anyone out there noticed any miraculous improvement in your mail-handling
>ability when you upgraded from Light to Beta? Did it improve your
>well-being (whatever that is!)? Are you a happier camper? Were you a
>happy camper?

Certainly was painless. The new expanded help is nice, and linked
URL's are, too. Other than that, don't see world-shaking change going
to the 16-bit version running WFW 3.11.

--
Dick Smith <rcsmith@netzone.com>
Mesa AZ,WFW 3.11,Eudora 1.5.4b11(16 bit)

dukerk@appstate.edu (Rodney K. Duke) wrote:

>In article <DMDC2r.nFx@emi.net>, fsimonds@emi.net says:
>>
>>Before I stand in line for my copy of the 1.5.4 Beta, will it really be
>>worth it? Eudora Light seems to hum along at a respectable clip here
>>inside the byte box...
>>
>>Anyone out there noticed any miraculous improvement in your mail-handling
>>ability when you upgraded from Light to Beta? Did it improve your
>>well-being (whatever that is!)? Are you a happier camper? Were you a
>>happy camper?
>>
>>Terry
>>
>See my posting of article 4903.  I could not connect to my mail server
>when I switched to the new beta version and kept the settings the same
>in my .ini file.  I reinstalled ver. 1.5.2 and everything was fine again.
>If you find out what the difference is between the two versions that
>caused this problem and what settings must be changed, please let me
>know.
I seem to remember having this problem when I changed over.  As far as
I remember I copied the 1.5.2 .ini into the directory where the 1.5.4
resided and away it went.

Nick
Powwow/Email at spalding@iol.ie

Hi,

I installed the beta version over my old version and it picked up
the settings automatically from the old version.  I had no problems
running it at all.  I am not sure what is causing your problems.

Stacey.

In article <4fdddj$aqt@lester.appstate.edu>,
   dukerk@appstate.edu (Rodney K. Duke) wrote:
>In article <DMDC2r.nFx@emi.net>, fsimonds@emi.net says:
>>
>>Before I stand in line for my copy of the 1.5.4 Beta, will it
really be
>>worth it? Eudora Light seems to hum along at a respectable clip
here
>>inside the byte box...
>>
>>Anyone out there noticed any miraculous improvement in your
mail-handling
>>ability when you upgraded from Light to Beta? Did it improve your
>>well-being (whatever that is!)? Are you a happier camper? Were you
a
>>happy camper?
>>
>>Terry
>>
>See my posting of article 4903.  I could not connect to my mail
server
>when I switched to the new beta version and kept the settings the
same
>in my .ini file.  I reinstalled ver. 1.5.2 and everything was fine
again.
>If you find out what the difference is between the two versions that
>caused this problem and what settings must be changed, please let me
>know.
>Thanks!
>
>Rodney
>dukerk@conrad.appstate.edu

>IMHO it is worth the download.  I like the feature where the new
>version recognizes URL links from within email messages and the
>ability to activate them from emails.

Ver. 1.5.2 does this very well for me!

Vicki