🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.internet.services.google
3 messages
3 total messages Started by D. Ray Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:43
"It's Embarrassingly Hard to Get Google Gemini to Acknowledge That White People Exist"
#2485
Author: D. Ray
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:43
11 lines
190 bytes
Google's so-called "AI" Gemini (formerly Bard) is being manually programmed
to erase white people.

…

…

<https://www.informationliberation.com/?idd305>

<https://archive.ph/ywmEq>

Re: "It's Embarrassingly Hard to Get Google Gemini to Acknowledge That White People Exist"
#2488
Author: immibis
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:25
21 lines
708 bytes
On 24/02/24 21:43, D. Ray wrote:
> Google's so-called "AI" Gemini (formerly Bard) is being manually programmed
> to erase white people.
>
> …
>
> …
>
> <https://www.informationliberation.com/?idd305>
>
> <https://archive.ph/ywmEq>
>
>

Most people, including white supremacists, don't acknowledge that white
people exist. White people are normally seen as the default, just
"people" and not "white people", unless being contrasted with something
else. "Black people" are often spoken of; so are "black and white
people"; "white people" is relatively rare unless coming from someone
who studies race a lot. Is it not the goal of an AI to mimic a human,
and therefore, to mimic human biases?
Re: "It's Embarrassingly Hard to Get Google Gemini to Acknowledge That White People Exist"
#2489
Author: D. Ray
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 06:46
41 lines
1559 bytes
immibis <news@immibis.com> wrote:
> On 24/02/24 21:43, D. Ray wrote:
>> Google's so-called "AI" Gemini (formerly Bard) is being manually programmed
>> to erase white people.
>>
>> …
>>
>> …
>>
>> <https://www.informationliberation.com/?idd305>
>>
>> <https://archive.ph/ywmEq>
>>
>>
>
> Most people, including white supremacists, don't acknowledge that white
> people exist.

So “White supremacists” think of Blacks when asked about people who were
born in Scotland in year 1820? I hope you understand how it sounds.

> White people are normally seen as the default, just
> "people" and not "white people", unless being contrasted with something
> else. "Black people" are often spoken of; so are "black and white
> people"; "white people" is relatively rare unless coming from someone
> who studies race a lot. Is it not the goal of an AI to mimic a human,
> and therefore, to mimic human biases?

Strange argument.

If human is imagining White people by default when thinking of people, then
AI is doing a bad job mimicking human by using any other race except of
White if race was not specified.

What really happens is, of course, that AI was manually programmed to do
that specifically in order to remove White people from history and
everywhere else and replace them with “diversity” instead, so future
generations will think that’s the way it always been.

I wonder how long it is until they start to recreate historical footage,
photographs, and paintings to insert “diversity”. AI will have that
capability very soon.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads