🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: max@gupta.portal on Fri, 13 Sep 1991 15:34

Re: VI and scandinavian chars.
By: woods@cbnewsc.cb on Fri, 13 Sep 1991 15:08

Re: improved vi
By: gwc@root.co.uk ( on Fri, 13 Sep 1991 14:12

Spelling checker
By: aacg@gmv.es (Agu on Fri, 13 Sep 1991 09:35

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: tr@samadams.prin on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 21:36

Suggestions for data editor
By: amaranth@vela.ac on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 21:02

Re: Spell check for Q-Edit 2.1???
By: ts@uwasa.fi (Tim on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 20:57

Re: ed: multiple searching
By: dattier@vpnet.ch on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 20:48

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: spl@alex.uucp (S on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 19:32

Re: Spell check for Q-Edit 2.1???
By: tporczyk@novell. on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 18:45

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: gallen@apollo.hp on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 18:03

Re: Small Keyboards for editing
By: hermit@cats.ucsc on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 17:01

Spell check for Q-Edit 2.1???
By: weller@ux1.cso.u on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 14:50

Re: Nice vs.nasty editors
By: hansm@cs.kun.nl on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 14:28

Re: improved vi
By: ctwomey@ccvax.uc on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 10:37

Re: improved vi
By: lshaw@ccwf.cc.ut on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 05:55

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: dnichols@ceilidh on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 04:07

Re: design suggestions sought for vi-based editor
By: gast@oahu.cs.ucl on Thu, 12 Sep 1991 03:33

Re: substitutions with pipe signs in .exrc
By: dattier@ddsw1.MC on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 23:52

Re: improved vi
By: bible@iastate.ed on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 21:30

Re: improved vi
By: ruba@molbio.ethz on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 19:16

Syntax directed editors
By: sink@pro.bso.uiu on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 16:17

Re: DOS or OS/2 Binary Editor with Global Search/Replace
By: pvr@wang.com (Pe on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 12:07

VI and scandinavian chars.
By: buboo@alf.uib.no on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 10:47

Re: improved vi
By: s887212@minyos.x on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 10:05

Editor withouh shell escape running on HP-UX
By: buboo@alf.uib.no on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 08:39

Re: improved vi
By: s902113@minyos.x on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 02:12

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: pardo@gar.cs.was on Wed, 11 Sep 1991 01:53

Re: substitutions with pipe signs in .exrc
By: dtau@mullian.ee. on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 23:45

Re: Nice vs.nasty editors
By: jba@gorm.ruc.dk on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 20:41

An editor running under Unix for BBS users
By: mjo@mtu.edu (Mik on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 20:08

Re: Small Keyboards for editing [ WAS: Re: Editors for the disabled ]
By: bhoughto@hopi.in on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 19:40

Re: improved vi
By: lshaw@ccwf.cc.ut on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 19:37

vi preserve file format
By: gheim@eng.auburn on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 19:16

Re: Nice vs.nasty editors
By: john@sco.COM (Jo on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 19:05

Re: Editors for the disabled
By: einari@rhi.hi.is on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 17:18

Re: DOS or OS/2 Binary Editor with Global Search/Replace
By: ts@uwasa.fi (Tim on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 16:46

Re: substitutions with pipe signs in .exrc
By: hansm@cs.kun.nl on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 15:11

Make emacs look like kedit , ned or wordperfect
By: xxbja@spica.lerc on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 13:57

DOS or OS/2 Binary Editor with Global Search/Replace
By: jmm@cs.brown.edu on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 13:15

Re: ed: multiple searching
By: dik@cwi.nl (Dik on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 13:09

Re: ed: multiple searching
By: malte@techfak.un on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 09:13

improved vi
By: rwatson@loki.une on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 07:18

substitutions with pipe signs in .exrc
By: david@cats.ucsc. on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 05:58

Re: design suggestions sought for vi-based editor
By: david@cats.ucsc. on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 05:54

Re: Stream-of-text marking in vi/le
By: tmoody@sjuphil.u on Tue, 10 Sep 1991 03:22

Re: design suggestions sought for vi-based editor
By: mayoff@austin.ed on Mon, 09 Sep 1991 21:34

Re: Editors for the disabled
By: lshaw@ccwf.cc.ut on Mon, 09 Sep 1991 21:09

Re: Editors for the disabled
By: peter@ficc.ferra on Mon, 09 Sep 1991 18:00

Re: design suggestions sought for vi-based editor
By: peter@ficc.ferra on Mon, 09 Sep 1991 17:51