Thread View: aus.politics
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by "nited"
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00
Aboriginal Monarchy
Author: "nited"
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00
30 lines
1468 bytes
1468 bytes
Aboriginal Monarchy My proposition of a "Aboriginal Monarchy" is a Honest attempt to bring together the twin dilemmas of Reconciliation and an Australian Head of State. We are at present a society with many divisions, spread over a vast urban continent searching for our own distinct identity. The present debate on the Republic does nothing to bring us as a nation together, seems to lack vision and most importantly fails to link the past with the future. There are many distasteful Republics that simply act as a front for dictatorial regimes and it is my fear that Australia will be on this path if we become a Republic. We have at present a vigorous democracy that seems to be working very well, sure there are changes that need to be made, but do we want to lose our freedoms? that we often take for granted. So please consider my post with a open mind. Instead of this republic madness why don't we have an Aboriginal King as our head of state. In this way we could have a monarchy and still have an Australian as a head of state. We cannot undo the past but through just parliamentary procedures a more permanent act of reconciliation could be enacted. Suitable lands would need to be acquired and palaces built. Coins and notes could carry the Monarchs picture. While the Kings birthday would become a genuine holiday, celebrated throughout Australia as a time of festivity and merriment, even prisoners could hope for a pardon on this special day.
Re: Aboriginal Monarchy
Author: enicholsrm@alpha
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00
33 lines
1622 bytes
1622 bytes
In article <WDgR3.4214$we.6923@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>, nited@bigpond.com says... > >Aboriginal Monarchy > >My proposition of a "Aboriginal Monarchy" is a Honest attempt to bring >together the twin dilemmas of Reconciliation and an Australian Head of >State. We are at present a society with many divisions, spread over a vast >urban continent searching for our own distinct identity. The present debate >on the Republic does nothing to bring us as a nation together, seems to lack >vision and most importantly fails to link the past with the future. There >are many distasteful Republics that simply act as a front for dictatorial >regimes and it is my fear that Australia will be on this path if we become a >Republic. We have at present a vigorous democracy that seems to be working >very well, sure there are changes that need to be made, but do we want to >lose our freedoms? that we often take for granted. So please consider my >post with a open mind. > > >Instead of this republic madness why don't we have an Aboriginal King as our >head of state. In this way we could have a monarchy and still have an >Australian as a head of state. We cannot undo the past but through just >parliamentary procedures a more permanent act of reconciliation could be >enacted. >Suitable lands would need to be acquired and palaces built. Coins and notes >could carry the Monarchs picture. While the Kings birthday would become a >genuine holiday, celebrated throughout Australia as a time of festivity and >merriment, even prisoners could hope for a pardon on this special day. Why do you keep persisting with this drivel?
Re: Aboriginal Monarchy
Author: nevilled@netspac
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00
54 lines
2901 bytes
2901 bytes
nited <nited@bigpond.com> wrote: > Aboriginal Monarchy > > My proposition of a "Aboriginal Monarchy" is a Honest attempt to bring > together the twin dilemmas of Reconciliation and an Australian Head of > State. We are at present a society with many divisions, spread over a vast > urban continent searching for our own distinct identity. The present debate > on the Republic does nothing to bring us as a nation together, seems to lack > vision and most importantly fails to link the past with the future. There > are many distasteful Republics that simply act as a front for dictatorial > regimes and it is my fear that Australia will be on this path if we become a > Republic. We have at present a vigorous democracy that seems to be working > very well, sure there are changes that need to be made, but do we want to > lose our freedoms? that we often take for granted. So please consider my > post with a open mind. > Well at least you've put some more thought into it since last time. But, seriously, looking at South Africa by way of comparison. The Zulus took a lot of convincing to allow one of their tribal enemies to become their country's first black President. If he'd tried to become their king instead, we would have seen a bloodbath worse than Rwanda. I am currently in favour of voting to retain the monarchy. Your proposal is the most convincing argument I've yet heard for doing the opposite. ;-) That way we can at least change our minds and elect another one if it didn't work out. As time goes by one of our Aboriginal leaders might develop similar stature to Nelson Mendala, but that is still a long way from happening yet. Not only does he have to be acceptable to mainstream Australians, he has to be acceptable to all other ATSIs as well. You may be surprised how deep ancient tribal animosities can run. Like trying to appoint an Arab or a Jew as king of Palestine as a means of achieving racial harmony in that land. Such a misguided move would probably have the opposite effect to what you are hoping to achieve ;-) > Instead of this republic madness why don't we have an Aboriginal King as our > head of state. In this way we could have a monarchy and still have an > Australian as a head of state. We cannot undo the past but through just > parliamentary procedures a more permanent act of reconciliation could be > enacted. > Suitable lands would need to be acquired and palaces built. Coins and notes > could carry the Monarchs picture. While the Kings birthday would become a > genuine holiday, celebrated throughout Australia as a time of festivity and > merriment, even prisoners could hope for a pardon on this special day. Cheers -- Neville Duguid * PC Political Science: "The insane should have * nevilled@netspace.net.au * the same rights as everyone else. Anyone * Spare me, spam me not. * who disagrees with them should not." *
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads