🚀 go-pugleaf

On Saturday, August 8, 2020 at 12:08:39 AM UTC-7, Your Name wrote:
> Of course the fanchise has "struggled" ... the morons destroyed it with
> ill-fitting Crap Trek "reboot" garbage and latest animated idiocy. And
> now they're reportedly thinking of going back to the original
> timeline?! Far too little, far too late. :-(
>
>

Thanks for the link. I hope they can come up with something.

Op 8-8-2020 om 09:08 schreef Your Name:
>
> Of course the fanchise has "struggled" ... the morons destroyed it with
> ill-fitting Crap Trek "reboot" garbage and latest animated idiocy. And
> now they're reportedly thinking of going back to the original timeline?!
> Far too little, far too late.  :-(
>
>
>
>  From ComingSoon.net ...
>
>
>     Noah Hawley's Star Trek reportedly stalled at Paramount
>     -------------------------------------------------------
>     Following the underwhelming box office numbers for Star Trek Beyond,
>     the film franchise of Paramount's long-running sci-fi universe has
>     struggled to find a path forward and while Legion's Noah Hawley
>     signed on to write and direct a fourth film in Abrams' Kelvin
>     Timeline, it appears the project has stalled at the studio,
>     according to Deadline.
>
>     Emma Watts, previously an exec at Fox, recently was appointed to
>     Paramount Motion Picture Group is currently reassessing the
>     forthcoming film slate for the studio, namely the state of the Star
>     Trek film franchise, which has been up in the air for the past four
>     years as various projects were put into development beginning with a
>     fourth film helmed by S.J. Clarkson before being shelved due to cast
>     contracting issues, an R-rated film helmed by Quentin Tarantino
>     penned by Mark L. Smith (The Revenant) and Hawley's project.
>
>     Sources report that Hawley's film was actually set to bring in a new
>     cast of characters rather than bringing back the Kelvin cast and
>     would see the protagonists race to cure a deadly virus and, though
>     Paramount hasn't confirmed anything as of yet, given the world's
>     current situation it may be an explanation as to why his project is
>     on hold. Tarantino unofficially dropped off the Smith-penned project
>     earlier this year but stated it would most likely be made at some
>     point, with the story set be based on a classic Star Trek episode
>     set earthbound in a '30s gangster setting.
>
>     Both projects are reportedly on hold at the studio, but the latter
>     is being considered a viable option to carry the franchise forward,
>     seen by the studio as a spinoff akin to the X-Men spin-off Logan and
>     may move forward with that plan while they figure out how to move
>     forward with the Kelvin Timeline or even one of the original
>     timelines.
>
>     With the CBS All Access series Discovery and Picard proving the
>     franchise is still successful for the studio, it makes sense
>     Paramount would rather take its time to move forward with another
>     Star Trek film rather than rush one out in a similar vein to Beyond.
>
>
> <https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/1144667-noah-hawleys-star-trek-reportedly-stalled-at-paramount>
>
>
>
>

They say DSC and Picard already are the original timeline. I cannot
concur. Specially for DSC.


--
Wouter Valentijn

Kirk: "No beach to walk on..."
Star Trek (s01e07): The Naked Time

http://www.prozaportal.j3v.net
http://www.essayportal.j3v.net

liam=mail