🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers
6 messages
6 total messages Started by icberg@ix.netcom Fri, 16 Feb 1996 00:00
Lee signs 4 year deal.
#3939
Author: icberg@ix.netcom
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 00:00
16 lines
746 bytes
Well, there's one less thing the Chargers have to worry about. Now
their biggest worry should be - are we stupid enough to really sign
bryan cox? I can't believe they are serious, but I guess they are. I
guess the Chargers and Bobby Ross' pronouncements about wanting
high-class good citizen types was just so much managerial bullshit.
Maybe they can find that doctor that prescribed all the drugs to the
Chargers in the early 70's and Cox can play the whole season on
thorazine.

Hey would Conrad Dobler be available to coach the OL? He would fit
right in with the Chargers new psychotic personality. Who's next Andre
Rison, Warren "Take That Bitch" Moon as back up QB, Buddy Ryan to
replace Adolph?

Oh, well. Win at any price I guess.

Iceberg
Re: Lee signs 4 year deal.
#3944
Author: escsf@igc.apc.or
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 00:00
22 lines
743 bytes
icberg@ix.netcom.com (iceberg) wrote:
>Well, there's one less thing the Chargers have to worry about. Now
>their biggest worry should be - are we stupid enough to really sign
>bryan cox? I can't believe they are serious, but I guess they are. I
>guess the Chargers and Bobby Ross' pronouncements about wanting
>high-class good citizen types was just so much managerial bullshit.
>Maybe they can find that doctor that prescribed all the drugs to the
>Chargers in the early 70's and Cox can play the whole season on
>thorazine.
>
The Chargers also extended Seau's contract for another year (until the
end of '98).
>
[complaining deleted}
>
>Oh, well. Win at any price I guess.
>
>Iceberg
>


"We ARE through the looking glass"
	-J.R. "Bob" Dobbs
Re: Lee signs 4 year deal.
#3949
Author: hurlock@umis.upe
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 00:00
18 lines
1038 bytes
iceberg (icberg@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: their biggest worry should be - are we stupid enough to really sign
: bryan cox? I can't believe they are serious, but I guess they are. I
: guess the Chargers and Bobby Ross' pronouncements about wanting
: high-class good citizen types was just so much managerial bullshit.

I say, if Bryan Cox can play, get him. The guy is a player and he would
make players around him better (re. Seau). I wouldn't worry about the
Buffalo incidents. Actually, I would in the sense that the guy has passion
for his team. Could you imagine how much he would hate the Raiders after
dawning the Lightning Bolts? His teammates have never had anything bad to
say that I know of. So I think he would be less of a distraction than LO'N.

Why are some people yearning for a team full of mormons. This is
football, as long as they make plays. Do we really another 9-7 season
with Lewis Bush and aren't we sick of losing the Millers, Harmons,
O'Neals and Richards and not replacing them with stud players.

Booman.
Re: Lee signs 4 year deal.
#3962
Author: budd@mailhost2.c
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 00:00
6 lines
478 bytes
Ok, I must give my $.02 about Bryan Cox.  He is not a bad citizen.  He
is a good guy with a bad temper.  The coaches at Miami named him the
Captain of the defense, he was LOVED by his teamates, and there was never
a conflict with the coaches or the team.  He may not be the smartest or
most rational human being, but if we can get him without breaking the
bank, it may be worth it.  The big question is, if we sign Bryan Cox,
will we be a better team?  The answer is obvious.
Re: Lee signs 4 year deal.
#3973
Author: travish@res.com
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00
11 lines
706 bytes
>Ok, I must give my $.02 about Bryan Cox.  He is not a bad citizen.  He
>is a good guy with a bad temper.  The coaches at Miami named him the
>Captain of the defense, he was LOVED by his teamates, and there was never
>a conflict with the coaches or the team.  He may not be the smartest or
>most rational human being, but if we can get him without breaking the
>bank, it may be worth it.  The big question is, if we sign Bryan Cox,
>will we be a better team?  The answer is obvious.

If one of the reasons for dumping O'Neal was that he was a bad
influence on the other players, should we really be adding Cox to our
lineup?  I'd be willing to endure a rebuilding year just to see Cox go
somewhere else.
Re: Lee signs 4 year deal.
#3980
Author: COMICKAZE@gnn.co
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00
34 lines
1178 bytes
In article <4g9n7l$elc@clare.res.com> Livewire wrote:
>Date:	Mon, 19 Feb 1996 11:33:05 GMT
>From:	travish@res.com (Livewire)
>Newsgroups:	alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers
>Subject:	Re: Lee signs 4 year deal.
>
>>Ok, I must give my $.02 about Bryan Cox.  He is not a bad
citizen.  He
>>is a good guy with a bad temper.  The coaches at Miami named
him the
>>Captain of the defense, he was LOVED by his teamates, and
there was never
>>a conflict with the coaches or the team.  He may not be the
smartest or
>>most rational human being, but if we can get him without
breaking the
>>bank, it may be worth it.  The big question is, if we sign
Bryan Cox,
>>will we be a better team?  The answer is obvious.
>
>If one of the reasons for dumping O'Neal was that he was a
bad
>influence on the other players, should we really be adding
Cox to our
>lineup?  I'd be willing to endure a rebuilding year just to
see Cox go
>somewhere else.
>
Hey, I'd much rather have a guy who smacks (physically)
players on the field and has a tremendous fire to win than a
guy like Oneal who talks the talk but can't walk the walk
and/or one of those wife/girlfriend slappers.

Comickaze
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads