Thread View: alt.engineering.electrical
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Joe Pompei
Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00
324 vs 741
Author: Joe Pompei
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00
4 lines
51 bytes
51 bytes
Anyone know if there's a functional difference?
Re: 324 vs 741
Author: ahaffner@aft.sn.
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00
15 lines
298 bytes
298 bytes
Joe Pompei <pompei@audia.music.nwu.edu> wrote: >Anyone know if there's a functional difference? Yeah, I think it is roughly 416.99 ;-) Andreas Haffner --------------------------------------------- ** This is my own opinion!....?....I think ** Homepage...........http://www.sn.no/~ahaffner
Re: 324 vs 741
Author: Jerry Codner
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00
22 lines
817 bytes
817 bytes
Joe Pompei wrote: > > Anyone know if there's a functional difference? If you mean the LM324 vs.the LM741 (or ua741, etc.) there is little difference in bandwidth or slew rate. The '324 has much lower input bias current, 40 nA, temperature stabilized vs. 500 nA for the '741. The '324 has PNP inputs so you have to current limit if the input voltage goes below the negative rail. Besides lower input bias current (and the '324 being a quad), the main difference is the '324 is capable of operating from a single supply as low as +5 volts. Although it is advertised that the output can go to ground in the single supply mode, the device has very high output impedance and poor pulse response in this range. Also, be careful to respect the input common mode range. Jerry Codner gcodner@lightlink.com
Re: 324 vs 741
Author: jkekoni@cc.hut.f
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 00:00
37 lines
1627 bytes
1627 bytes
To: pompei@audia.music.nwu.edu (Joe Pompei) Subject: Re: 324 vs 741 Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical In article <31E57CC6.41C6@audia.music.nwu.edu> you wrote: : Anyone know if there's a functional difference? You mean op-amps right. I dont know if this goes for 741, but max-voltage holder ciruit didnt work with 10n C and lm324, becouse the lm324 LEAKED CURRENT TO INPUT enoght to raise the vlotge to Vin in a couple of seconds. It worked well on tl074.(fet input) we didnr have time to test 741 before the labaratory class ended. I hope this helps. 324 doesnt have balancing things 741 does. lm324 has some small unlinearities around 0v. i dont know if 741 does. -- _---------------------------------------------------------------_ _- Joonas Kekoni OH2MTF I -_ _-internet: jkekoni@beta.hut.fi I DO NOT EAT. -_ _-slowmail: j{mer{ntaival 7a176 I -_ _- 02150Espoo I It is a monitor -_ _- Finland/Europe I -_ ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- _---------------------------------------------------------------_ _- Joonas Kekoni OH2MTF I -_ _-internet: jkekoni@beta.hut.fi I DO NOT EAT. -_ _-slowmail: j{mer{ntaival 7a176 I -_ _- 02150Espoo I It is a monitor -_ _- Finland/Europe I -_ -----------------------------------------------------------------
Re: 324 vs 741
Author: "C. Duffey"
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 00:00
12 lines
389 bytes
389 bytes
Joe Pompei wrote: > > Anyone know if there's a functional difference? Aside from the distortion issue - LM324's also are designed to work from a single supply exhibiting nearly rail to rail output (OK but not great). I have built fairly descent differential amps with these guys and single supply. If I have a dual supply available I wouldn't use them they really are antiques.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads