🚀 go-pugleaf

ME wrote:

> On Friday, 29 April 2022 at 16:48:41 UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> On 2022-04-26 3:58 p.m., Michael Pendragon wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 1:31:47 PM UTC-4, george...@yahoo.ca wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 9:43:10 PM UTC-4, ME wrote:
>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should have said dance, you shit slinging senile little monkey.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that classier?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You forgot to include "motherfucker."
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael, I was trying to stay classy.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure you did your best.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You do realize that "shit slinging," "senile," "little monkey," and "motherfucker" are all words that Stinky George and ("motherfucker" excepted) Will Donkey have been throwing around for weeks?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. Miss ME usually likes to call people "retards" and "cunts" (though
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in her earlier contribution to the poetry discussion she borrowed Mr.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dink's "eat shit and die" catchphrase). It's good to see her stealing up
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for a change.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ME's comment was directed at your tolerance for the pissbum posse's lack of self-restraint.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm surprised that you didn't feel the sting.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, rest assured: every time you call someone "Donkey" or "Stinky" and
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the ingrate calls you "monkey" or "motherfucker" back, I feel your pain,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Snowflake.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm well aware of your tit for tat ethics, George. Regardless of whether you feel the Donkey and Stink's expletive laden hate spews are deserved, ME's comment remains a stinging assessment of your hypocrisy.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> If Miss ME is claiming hypocrisy, then Miss ME is confused about what
>> >>>>>>>>>> the term means. Hypocrisy is professing moral beliefs while not acting
>> >>>>>>>>>> on them, which violates the virtue of integrity. In this case, though,
>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd be called a hypocrite for holding a set of beliefs (T4T) and acting
>> >>>>>>>>>> on it (by not condemning other people for acting on the same beliefs
>> >>>>>>>>>> themselves).
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ME wasn't referring to your T4T "ethics," George.
>> >>>>>>>> Funny, that's not what you were saying yesterday.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> MP: 'I'm well aware of your tit for tat ethics, George ..."
>> >>>>>>>> MP: "Hush, Donkey. The adults were discussing ethics."
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> We'll note that was your claim, not Miss ME's.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Apparently you missed some portion of the exchange.
>> >>>>>>>> Apparently you missed at least three portions; the two up above, and the
>> >>>>>>>> one I added below.
>> >>>>>>>> Here's a not-quite-instant replay:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ME: Hi dance. Why don’t you eat shit and die, you fucking cunt.
>> >>>>>>>>> STINK: Oh you as SO CLASSY..... not....
>> >>>>>>>> Exactly. Your online friend told me to "eat shit and die" because I
>> >>>>>>>> criticized her other online friend's "poem" - and rightly got SPNAKED
>> >>>>>>>> for it.
>> >>>>>>>>> ME: I should have said dance, you shit slinging senile little monkey.
>> >>>>>>>>> Is that classier?
>> >>>>>>>> MP: You forgot to include "motherfucker."
>> >>>>>>>>> GD: That's probably as classy as you can get.
>> >>>>>>>> Exactly. ME began calling me more names (when I still hadn't called
>> >>>>>>>> anyone to start) and you jumped in to call me one yourself.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The barb is double-edged.
>> >>>>>>>> : pricking both of our group's Georges. Stinky George for his hypocrisy
>> >>>>>>>> (see above) and you for yours (in turning a blind eye to Stinky's offenses).
>> >>>>>>>> Neither Zod nor I were being hypocritical for you to claim that, then
>> >>>>>>>> you don't understand what hypocrisy is. (See above).
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> We just need Will to second this with a "shit slinging monkey" and Zod to chime in with "motherfucking pinhead" to make George look the fool..
>> >>>>>> Start calling them "Donkey" and "Stink," and I'm sure you'll get that in
>> >>>>>> return. Will you whine about it as much as Mr. Pendragon is?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Neither of us are whining about anything, George.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The first post you made in this thread complaining to me about the names
>> >>>> you were being called by Will and Zod, I wouldn't have called it
>> >>>> "whining," but since you've gone on complaining about it in post after
>> >>>> post, that sounds like the best word.
>> >>>
>> >>> No one is complaining about being called names by the Donkey and his sock.
>> >>>
>>
>>
>> >>> We're complaining about how *you* constantly reprimand ME for using four-letter words
>> >> Oh, come on. I don't criticize anyone's use of "four-letter words". ME
>> >> got reprimanded twice this month for trolling to start fights in poem
>> >> threads - with Karen, and then with me.
>> >
>> > That simply isn't true, George.
>> Of course it's true. This is one of the threads. Here's the other:
>> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.arts.poetry.comments/c/4UzuHOm2Iuk/m/PXVTJbCLAgAJ
>> > Your comment ("That's probably as classy as you can get.") directly referred to her use of "Cunt."
>>
>> > It's all archived in this thread (see above).
>> The only one comment of mine that I can see in what you C&p'd is this one:
>> GD: That's probably as classy as you can get.
>> Please point out the direct reference to the use of the word cunt in
>> that sentence.
>> > Why do you think that you didn't deserve to be called a "Cunt"?
>> >
>> Why do you think you don't deserve to be called a "shit-slinging monkey"
>> when you go around saying things like that to people?
>> > You were attacking one of ME's friends.
>> That's not true. I was criticizing the poem in the OP (which was, true
>> enough, written by one her "friends."
>> > She was only titting your tat.
>> >
>> Oh, no: criticizing a poem (or a poet *qua* poet) is not aggression, and
>> disrupting a thread through trolling just because you can't handle the
>> criticism is not retaliation.
>> > Or is it only okay for you and your friends to retaliate against a provocation?
>> >
>> No, that's not why her trashy act fails as 'retaliation.'
>> >
>> > You have no problem with either you or your allies playing T4T and/or with their use of four-letter words while doing so; yet you have a big problem with it when somebody does it to you.
>> As I just explained, ME's trashy act fails as retaliation.
>> > That makes you a hypocrite in my book.
>> >
>> Wonderful! You failed to prove your claim that I was a "hypocrite"
>> because of my alleged objection to profanity, so you've decided to shift
>> the goal posts. Now you're claiming I'm a hypocrite because I have a
>> 'big problem' with my own ethics being applied. Does that mean you're
>> withdrawing your earlier claim you couldn't post proof of, that:
>> "George Dance reprimands others for using obscene language"?
>> >
>> > Please stop putting false statements into my mouth.
>> >
>> > I'm saying that Will, Stink and George Dance all use four-letter words when attacking others and disrupting threads. When you and your cronies do it, you claim that it's T4T, which makes it not only acceptable, but demanded, by your personal system of "ethics." But when ME does the same thing back to you, you claim that she lacks class.
>>
>> > Are you and the Donkey Duo equally low class?
>> >
>> > Or are you a being a hypocrite?
>> >
>> > It's got to be one or the other. Take your choice.
>> >
>> As I've repeatedly explained to you, calling someone names (whether
>> using four-letter words or not) against someone who's already been
>> calling you names, and calling someone names because they criticized
>> your poem, are not "the same thing."
>>
>> For you to think they are means you don't understand T4T very well.
>>
>> snip


> dance, now you are just acting like an obstinate cunt.
> Thank you for proving ME right.

You are never anything but a confused cyber bully... ha ha.